Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL.com article: Top Lockerroom messengers


Fireball77

Recommended Posts

He had positive and negative ones which I thought was an interesting take. Must say not surprised about Draft. I like him a bunch when he was in Carolina. Smart dude. I'm not really surprised by a lot of them. The guy has some interesting comments for some of the players too. Some that are perceived as positive voices in their lockerrooms sure are tools in my book though like Crayton, Lewis, Porter and Pierce

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8108455c&template=without-video-with-comments&confirm=true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina: QB Jake Delhomme -- Courageous, tough player whose down-home style clicks in his locker room.
not bad.

i think he's right that cincy is changing. palmer has really stepped it up this offseason. much more vocal than i have heard from him.

it's a shame about the bills but that might be right.

about bart scott stepping up at the jets, i can see that. it's been a long time coming.

i have a hard time, though, with guys that are new to the team being considered 'the voice' but i guess in those situations there really isn't anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^

Yeah, the specific nature of his comments like the one about Jake made me feel as though he asked around and found out real opinions instead of just hazarding guesses.

With teams like SF (in transition, no real mainstays as players), I can see the guy's point.

I was surprised that the Bills ever let London Fletcher go to be honest.

I think Palmer is sick of the Ocho circus and who can blame him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...