Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Athleticism trumps weight DL prospects


Catweisers

Recommended Posts

It's worth noting that Hurney has always been a 'game tape' guy rather than a workout guy. This means that whoever we take will likely be someone who had good production/game tape in college. Brockers really doesn't fit that, IMO. He's a physical freak, but he doesn't really stand out on tape like you'd expect a top-10 prospect to and didn't put up stats that make you take notice.

Just throwing that out there... Hurney almost always tends to pick the player who has the best game tape rather than the player who looks the part or is more athletic or whatever the case may be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's worth noting that Hurney has always been a 'game tape' guy rather than a workout guy. This means that whoever we take will likely be someone who had good production/game tape in college. Brockers really doesn't fit that, IMO. He's a physical freak, but he doesn't really stand out on tape like you'd expect a top-10 prospect to and didn't put up stats that make you take notice.

Just throwing that out there... Hurney almost always tends to pick the player who has the best game tape rather than the player who looks the part or is more athletic or whatever the case may be.

If Brockers does well at the bench press and runs a decent 40, I don't think we'll have to worry, he'll be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brockers only did 19 reps during the bench press. In contrast, Memphis DT Dontari Poe did 44... and he's equally athletic, albeit much larger than Brockers.

If we're going to go DT, I'd MUCH rather trade down into the 20's and take Poe. Hell, at this point I honestly wouldn't mind taking him 9th overall. His stock appears to be rising quickly. He reminds me a lot of Haloti Ngata, TBH. Big space-eater who commands double teams, collapses the pocket, and would make Johnson/Hardy/Keiser's jobs a lot easier.

Plus, long-term if McClain develops the tandem of Poe + McClain reminds me a lot of the 'Williams wall' in Minnesota a few years back with one big monster run stuffer and one pass rusher/penetrator.

Plus, Poe was on a terrible Memphis team and had basically zero help and still managed to play his way into the 1st/2nd round, which shows that he can perform even when surrounded by inferior talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...