Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cat Scratch Reader article about what offense we will run.


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

http://www.derp/2011/2/5/1975521/so-what-will-the-offense-look-like-in-2011-part-one

I found this part most interesting.

---------------------------------------------

Let's end the suspense before it starts. Presumably, Chud has picked up some things along the way from the offensive coordinators he worked for. In his career, he's worked under Terry Robiski, Cam Cameron, and Clarence Shelmon. All three are advocates of the Coryell offense, and in particular the Norv Turner variant. Coincidentally, Norv Turner is the current head coach of the Chargers, Chud's last team. So if you're wondering, the odds are pretty good that this is what we see in Carolina next year.

And let's get the irony out of the way. Our last Offensive Coordinator was Jeff Davidson, who followed Chud in Cleveland. Chud ran a variation of the Air Coryell offense there, and Davidson went to an Erhardt-Perkins system. Prior to Davidson's tenure, Dan Henning worked the sidelines in Carolina, and he also ran the Air Coryell offense. Davidson came here and again changed it to an Erhardt-Perkins system. And now Chud gets to follow Davidson and put the Coryell system back.

---------------------------------------------

It's a two part article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thought of Clausen running an Air Coryell attack doesn't encourage me much. He's way better suited to a West Coast Offense :(

Honestly, of guys that are connected (sort of) to the Panthers right now, the QB with the best skill set is probably...(cue dramatic music)...Matt Moore.

I still think our starter for the coming year will be a vet like Volek though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scot, look at what Turner did with the Coryell offense in Dallas. There was still the long ball, but a real emphasis on quick short and mid-range passes based on timing. I probably could have put more in there on that, but my fingers were tired...

I figure if Clausen is the starter, they'll adapt to his particular strengths and weaknesses. If we can't threaten downfield though, we'll be limited in both run and pass. Definitely not Clausen's strong suit.

Again though, I'm not especially convinced that Clausen will be the starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think limiting the new staff by assuming they can't/won't devise an offense according to our players and not the other way is a mistake. The past here is not a clear indication of the future.

Not sure what you mean by that? Are you suggesting we're looking at another offensive system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure if Clausen is the starter, they'll adapt to his particular strengths and weaknesses. If we can't threaten downfield though, we'll be limited in both run and pass. Definitely not Clausen's strong suit.

Again though, I'm not especially convinced that Clausen will be the starter.

Yeah, I was thinking that. Then I started looking at who else is out there, and the odds we get them. Frankly, I'm not sold that Clausen would get beat out in Training Camp by Billy Volek. But when I say that, I'm assuming he makes a decent improvement from his rookie year.

Worst case would be a year two Jimmy, though, which just about has to be better than year one. And our quarterback doesn't have to air it out deep constantly, just enough to remind the defense that he's willing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it helps that Bryce and Tmac worked out a bit this off-season before the draft and are familiar with each other's game from way back.  Sure Bryce put in a good word for him to the coaching crew ahead of time That california connection goin' work, I hope
    • Sign but make it mostly incentive driven contract
    • My biggest problem is I think the players he likes don't really work in the modern NFL.  You mentioned the wr room being a lot better, is it?  It has the potential to be.   Last year when we traded up to get Legette, they said they traded up to take him specifically because he was a true X receiver.   Now this year they take TMac because they say he is and that XL was out of posisition last year.  Im not sold on Tmac yet just like I wasn't sold on XL last year.  If TMac isn't a lot better than last XL was last season then that's back to back first rounders in one position that would still need a huge amount of work.  Hopefully Tmac is what everyone seems to think he will be, I'm just not so sure, but them declaring XL was a true X receiver after the draft last year and what they're saying now should at least give you pause about their receivers evaluation because it means they definitely made a mistake one way or another.
×
×
  • Create New...