Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trgovac Quote Thread


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

0star.gifThumbsUp.gifThumbsDwn.gif“He doesn't get into the calls that I make. Sometimes he'll talk about certain situations ... but he doesn't mess with you much on game day. Sometimes, he will come up to you and say stuff. A lot of times I've already seen it, but he's making sure that I've seen it. It's the job of a head coach to do that. He doesn't leave any stone unturned.”as0.gifMike Trgovac quote

If this is true then it gives me hope that Fox may pull the trigger and let him go. Sorenson made it sound like he is a Fox puppet, but he says he makes his own calls. If so then they are the wrong ones!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best one was one I heard a couple years ago. I cant remember but it was something like;

"were not gonna beat teams with schemes, were gonna beat teams with sound fundamentals"

.....yeah.... rigggggght...

By "sound fundamentals", he means screaming at the receiver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best one was one I heard a couple years ago. I cant remember but it was something like;

"were not gonna beat teams with schemes, were gonna beat teams with sound fundamentals"

.....yeah.... rigggggght...

that's true, but if your scheme is absolutely horrible it will make you lose games even with sound fundamentals as we all saw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hesitant to jump on this bandwagon before I hear the other side.

Surely there are some who can offer reasons to keep him.

Defensive coordinators have a lot of trouble. Either you don't have enough pressure and passes are completed, or you blitz too much and you get beaten with checkdowns.

Questions are going to be asked of any DC after we got lit up like we did against the Cardinals.

Realistically though, the last few weeks of the season the DLine has been incredibly banged up and its been near impossible to keep the best four man front on the field possible for four quarters. Yeah, its his job to find adjustments for that, but if execution isn't there, through fatigue, inexperience, lack of talent, or the offense recognises what is happening then its a moot point.

Foxism stating that "the other team practices too" is very true. It really pertains to the other team doing their study. Teams know that when X player is in then Y alignment / play is likely and the great coaches adjust for this.

Trgovac isn't a great DC, and I'll get flamed for this, but he isn't a bad DC.

Sure Fitzgerald burned us, but on two seperate plays zone coverage was completely blown by linebackers and corners being in the wrong spot and in another two situations we missed tackles. In a few others the defensive line failed to get off their blocks and get pressure.

If on a play where your line gets no pressure, linebacker misses his zone, the corner fails to tackle the receiver, is it really the DC's fault when he's got the perfect play that will come off brilliantly if that linebacker just maintains his discipline, or that corner just lowers his shoulder that bit harder?

There's arguments for both, but this year the issue was defensive line execution, no interior pass rush and no good rotation at DT was the big issue this year. Blitzes are all well and good, but fox ball is about the Dline. I'd expect a DT early in the draft or FA this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defensive coordinators have a lot of trouble. Either you don't have enough pressure and passes are completed, or you blitz too much and you get beaten with checkdowns.

Questions are going to be asked of any DC after we got lit up like we did against the Cardinals.

Realistically though, the last few weeks of the season the DLine has been incredibly banged up and its been near impossible to keep the best four man front on the field possible for four quarters. Yeah, its his job to find adjustments for that, but if execution isn't there, through fatigue, inexperience, lack of talent, or the offense recognises what is happening then its a moot point.

Foxism stating that "the other team practices too" is very true. It really pertains to the other team doing their study. Teams know that when X player is in then Y alignment / play is likely and the great coaches adjust for this.

Trgovac isn't a great DC, and I'll get flamed for this, but he isn't a bad DC.

Sure Fitzgerald burned us, but on two seperate plays zone coverage was completely blown by linebackers and corners being in the wrong spot and in another two situations we missed tackles. In a few others the defensive line failed to get off their blocks and get pressure.

If on a play where your line gets no pressure, linebacker misses his zone, the corner fails to tackle the receiver, is it really the DC's fault when he's got the perfect play that will come off brilliantly if that linebacker just maintains his discipline, or that corner just lowers his shoulder that bit harder?

There's arguments for both, but this year the issue was defensive line execution, no interior pass rush and no good rotation at DT was the big issue this year. Blitzes are all well and good, but fox ball is about the Dline. I'd expect a DT early in the draft or FA this year.

You make alot of good points but I don't really care much for his game planning in the 1st place. Someone mentioned it in the POST Game interview with John Fox about playing Fitzgerald the way we did in Arizona a couple of years ago. They pretty much shut him down. That wasn't even persued this time. WTF. Breston is good but between Fitz and Breston I will take making Breston beat us not Fitz.

Let's go back to the days when we had Jack Del Rio as our DC. He got more out of those players than Trgovac ever did. Trgovac has had much better talent. I think his "Schemes" are easy to beat and he makes no major adjustments.

If he really was that noticable he would have been tabbed as a Head Coach by now. Think it is around the league his philosophy is generic?

I won't be heartbroken if he is gone next season.

JMO

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best one was one I heard a couple years ago. I cant remember but it was something like;

"were not gonna beat teams with schemes, were gonna beat teams with sound fundamentals"

.....yeah.... rigggggght...

I'm pretty sure the quote you're thinking of had something with him saying "We're not trying to outsmart the other team...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defensive coordinators have a lot of trouble. Either you don't have enough pressure and passes are completed, or you blitz too much and you get beaten with checkdowns.

Questions are going to be asked of any DC after we got lit up like we did against the Cardinals.

Realistically though, the last few weeks of the season the DLine has been incredibly banged up and its been near impossible to keep the best four man front on the field possible for four quarters. Yeah, its his job to find adjustments for that, but if execution isn't there, through fatigue, inexperience, lack of talent, or the offense recognises what is happening then its a moot point.

Foxism stating that "the other team practices too" is very true. It really pertains to the other team doing their study. Teams know that when X player is in then Y alignment / play is likely and the great coaches adjust for this.

Trgovac isn't a great DC, and I'll get flamed for this, but he isn't a bad DC.

Sure Fitzgerald burned us, but on two seperate plays zone coverage was completely blown by linebackers and corners being in the wrong spot and in another two situations we missed tackles. In a few others the defensive line failed to get off their blocks and get pressure.

If on a play where your line gets no pressure, linebacker misses his zone, the corner fails to tackle the receiver, is it really the DC's fault when he's got the perfect play that will come off brilliantly if that linebacker just maintains his discipline, or that corner just lowers his shoulder that bit harder?

There's arguments for both, but this year the issue was defensive line execution, no interior pass rush and no good rotation at DT was the big issue this year. Blitzes are all well and good, but fox ball is about the Dline. I'd expect a DT early in the draft or FA this year.

Don't agree on several points. First of all our DTs were healthy for this game and we had our full rotation in place. What you said might be true against New York and New Orleans but not Arizona.

Secondly, if he can change his scheme to a man coverage and shut them down in the second half, why didn't we do it right away. Analysis of the first Arizona game and the new Orleans game should make it painfully clear that we weren't playing good zone coverage and had lots of blown coverages. Why would he think that all of a sudden we would fix that and it wouldn't be a problem against an all-pro receiver who has burned us repeatedly over the past few years. And DC worth their salt don't play coverages that their players suck in executing. How amny blown coverages do you need to see before you go to another scheme like man coverage with help over the top to ensure their is at least one if not 2 guys on the man. Especially Fitzgerald who they know if the only big time threat on their team.

And when he sees that Boldin doesn't play why not roll constant safety coverage to Fitz's side or use Gamble to cover him where ever he went. We made no adjustments when Fitzgerald lined up over Marshall for example where deep help comes from the linebacker. Why??

They could exploit our defense and found desirable matchups anytime they wanted. We played a vanilla straight up defnse with no new wrinkles or variations in the first half. it was child's play for them to call plays to do whatever they wanted since we didn't disguise or change anything.

What about D line pressure? Did you see many overloads, stunts or attempts to confuse Warner and disguise our looks? Go back and see how many times we put 6 or 7 guys on the line to confuse the offensive line blocking assignments in the first half. We did more of that in the second half and guess what happened? It worked! Why didn't we come out doing it??

That is the problem with Trgovac. He had 2 weeks to prepare and came out with a vanilla base look and coverage which fooled no one and got us abused. When he did make changes it was too little too late.

He IS a bad defensive coordinator who lacks imagination and make too few adjustments too late to make a difference. He blitzes out of desperation rather than design with almost never works at that point. You get beat with checkdowns for example when they know you are blitzing and make adjustments at the line. Teams that blitz successfully blitz when you don't expect it or like Philly jump the obvious checkdown routes and either take them away or intercept the ball. But again they play an aggressive man scheme not a weak passive zone like we do.

I will be hugely surprised if Fitzgerald burns them for 200 yards this week and they will have Boldin playing as well.

This week will give you a great chance to see some great defense and coordinators. 3 of the 4 teams left have the number 1, 2 and 3 ranked defenses in the league. Get back with on Monday and then tell me how Trgo isn't a bad coordinator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't agree on several points. First of all our DTs were healthy for this game and we had our full rotation in place. What you said might be true against New York and New Orleans but not Arizona.

Secondly, if he can change his scheme to a man coverage and shut them down in the second half, why didn't we do it right away. Analysis of the first Arizona game and the new Orleans game should make it painfully clear that we weren't playing good zone coverage and had lots of blown coverages. Why would he think that all of a sudden we would fix that and it wouldn't be a problem against an all-pro receiver who has burned us repeatedly over the past few years. And DC worth their salt don't play coverages that their players suck in executing. How amny blown coverages do you need to see before you go to another scheme like man coverage with help over the top to ensure their is at least one if not 2 guys on the man. Especially Fitzgerald who they know if the only big time threat on their team.

And when he sees that Boldin doesn't play why not roll constant safety coverage to Fitz's side or use Gamble to cover him where ever he went. We made no adjustments when Fitzgerald lined up over Marshall for example where deep help comes from the linebacker. Why??

They could exploit our defense and found desirable matchups anytime they wanted. We played a vanilla straight up defnse with no new wrinkles or variations in the first half. it was child's play for them to call plays to do whatever they wanted since we didn't disguise or change anything.

What about D line pressure? Did you see many overloads, stunts or attempts to confuse Warner and disguise our looks? Go back and see how many times we put 6 or 7 guys on the line to confuse the offensive line blocking assignments in the first half. We did more of that in the second half and guess what happened? It worked! Why didn't we come out doing it??

That is the problem with Trgovac. He had 2 weeks to prepare and came out with a vanilla base look and coverage which fooled no one and got us abused. When he did make changes it was too little too late.

He IS a bad defensive coordinator who lacks imagination and make too few adjustments too late to make a difference. He blitzes out of desperation rather than design with almost never works at that point. You get beat with checkdowns for example when they know you are blitzing and make adjustments at the line. Teams that blitz successfully blitz when you don't expect it or like Philly jump the obvious checkdown routes and either take them away or intercept the ball. But again they play an aggressive man scheme not a weak passive zone like we do.

I will be hugely surprised if Fitzgerald burns them for 200 yards this week and they will have Boldin playing as well.

This week will give you a great chance to see some great defense and coordinators. 3 of the 4 teams left have the number 1, 2 and 3 ranked defenses in the league. Get back with on Monday and then tell me how Trgo isn't a bad coordinator.

Preach it, brotha!

I think the proof will be in the pudding after the Philly/AZ game. Even if Philly gets beat, it won't be because of a stupid defensive game plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did we take over a thread about who you'd take #1 by having a debate on who you'd take #1? Basically you still don't want to answer my question, probably because your answer would be either T-Mac like myself, or Hunter, which taking a CB #1 overall is even crazier on the surface than what you're saying I'm stupid for in wanting a WR there. As I've said before, it's a season without a traditional clear top pick(s).  It would be great if we could trade back if we got #1, but if not, there's nothing wrong with taking a truly elite WR and build out our roster correctly for once instead of always trying to find the quick fix and it backfiring. 
    • I just thought of an interesting comparison for what I'm arguing with taking T-Mac and how to build up to hopefully being a contender. The mid 2000's Arizona Cardinals In 2003 they took Anquan Boldin early in the 2nd, kinda a decent comp for Legette with style of play and being more of an elite #2 than a true outside #1 (they also took a WR in the 1st too who didn't pan out). In 2004 they took Larry Fitzgerald #3 overall, the true outside #1. Their QB's at the time, Jeff Blake and Josh McCown The QB they passed on to take Fizgerald, Philip Rivers. They were in the Super Bowl a few years later after they found their QB in Warner to slot into an already built out roster of elite weapons. Cam, you asked how it would look if we passed on a QB who pans out for a WR, well, do you think the Cardinals regret taking Fitz over Rivers?  I highly doubt it. Our roster is more than one offseason away from contending.  I'm not looking for the quick fix because there isn't one with the state of this franchise at the moment, I'm looking to contend for a decade. I don't think a QB in this draft class is good enough to take 1st overall with everything else we still need.  My next preference would be an elite pass rusher, but again, I don't see one of them in this draft either. My personal bias aside, I very honestly think T-Mac is the most can't miss offensive prospect in this draft (Hunter would be that on defense).  He is the WR we've been trying to get since we lost Smitty.   Brooks, T-Mac, Legette, Coker/FA, Sanders would have the potential to be one of the best offensive weapon sets in the NFL.  Sure, hopefully we could hit on a superstar QB in the next draft, but even if not, if those guys pan out, with them all are in their prime together, we wouldn't need a Mahomes or Allen to contend, we'd only need to find our Jared Goff. and spend all our FA money the next couple offseason on Defense.
    • Competent QBs can read defenses presnap, see where their best matchups are and already know where they're going with the ball. Then have good footwork with fast fundamentally sound dropbacks. See the field well and decisive with their decisions on where to go with the ball. And an NFL caliber arm, get the ball out quickly and deliver it with velocity. Bryce can do none of these things.
×
×
  • Create New...