Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

matt moore


speedy233

Recommended Posts

I just can't believe the team is considering Feeley as the No. 2 quarterback. I realize that the coaches see a lot more of these guys than we do, but Moore looked good in his rookie year. He's had time to learn the playbook and the offense, and in my opinion he looked better than McCown in the preseason.

If we have to go to someone other than Delhomme, it might as well be Moore. We've kept him in the roster for three years -- it's time to find out if he has any shot as Jake's heir apparent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't believe the team is considering Feeley as the No. 2 quarterback. I realize that the coaches see a lot more of these guys than we do, but Moore looked good in his rookie year. He's had time to learn the playbook and the offense, and in my opinion he looked better than McCown in the preseason.

If we have to go to someone other than Delhomme, it might as well be Moore. We've kept him in the roster for three years -- it's time to find out if he has any shot as Jake's heir apparent.

Dont worry, this might be the end of Fox

Jake gonna falter, they put in Feely who wont do much better, and by time they get to Moore... its too late

Bye Bye Foxy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think theres a little more to it then just choosing Moore over Fox.

"if they don't play Moore, Fox will be gone" sounds close enough.

Moore has a lot of talent. He couldn't freaking beat out McCown and he's not efficient. It's great he's got arm and gets the ball downfield, but the changeup this team needs has veteran experience and can be efficient. I can completely see this team wanting a conservative guy instead of a younger Delhomme to relieve Delhomme. That's not something you fire a guy over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"if they don't play Moore, Fox will be gone" sounds close enough.

Moore has a lot of talent. He couldn't freaking beat out McCown and he's not efficient. It's great he's got arm and gets the ball down field, but the change up this team needs has veteran experience and can be efficient. I can completely see this team wanting a conservative guy instead of a younger Delhomme to relieve Delhomme. That's not something you fire a guy over.

Fox prefers veterans over rookies and sometimes he hurts the team doing that look at Foster/Williams deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"if they don't play Moore, Fox will be gone" sounds close enough.

Moore has a lot of talent. He couldn't freaking beat out McCown and he's not efficient. It's great he's got arm and gets the ball downfield, but the changeup this team needs has veteran experience and can be efficient. I can completely see this team wanting a conservative guy instead of a younger Delhomme to relieve Delhomme. That's not something you fire a guy over.

Well why keep Moore on the team? Why not fill the #2 and #3 slots with a couple of old "has beens"and "clipboard holders"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...