LinvilleGorge

He specifically didn't say LB. I'd make note of that. Very well could indicate that's the target position.

It's why I hated the Butler and Shaq picks. When we made those picks, DT and LB were probably our strongest position groups and we looked past huge needs to make luxury picks for depth and future development. Now if we'd drafted guys who developed into perennial All Pros, all good. But that's kinda what you need to justify those types of luxury picks. Some would argue that Shaq justified it. I wouldn't. Just because we ended up paying him like an All Pro doesn't mean he was an All Pro (note: he wasn't). Butler was an outright bust which makes it a really tough pill to swallow for a luxury pick.

I get it. When you have obvious pressing needs you're ideally looking for a starter at #19. Obviously you draft for depth later in the draft but you want early impact out of your early picks. The context of that quote was the 19th overall pick. The other thing to note is that this is also peak lying season. You don't want to telegraph your intentions. Even if we were seriously considering or even targeting OT at 19 the smart move would be to downplay it. Virtually everyone expected us to go pass rusher in the 1st last year and lo and behold we go WR which very few people were talking about as a legit possibility.

Yeah, 20 wins for a UNC level program is not a good season. And when a number like that is so cherry picked it makes me go looking. Roy only won 19 games his first season but then proceeded to win 30+ in four of the next five. Hubert never won 30+. Schemer only has four seasons completed and will almost certainly win 20+ next season likely with an overall winning percentage significantly above Hubert's. Schemer just has to figure out how to close the deal in the big dance but it's hard with a revolving door of ine and doners. Yeah, those kids are super talented but they're still freshmen and are prone to doing dumb poo when the pressure gets dialed up to 11. Always been the case, always will be. We can go back to our '93 title as a perfect example. Michigan's Fab 5 with a super talented freshman dominated team and the best of the bunch cranks in crunch time first with an uncalled obvious travel, then the infamous timeout with no timeouts remaining. Freshmen gonna freshman.

Yes, more recently. The way duke fans act you'd think they'd won five of the last ten or something crazy when they've actually won zero if the last ten. They haven't even even played in a championship ship game in the last decade. Carolina has played in three. For all the elite NBA talent that has come through Durham, duke is in a woeful championship drought. Duke fans used to talk all kinds of poo about how Carolina failed to win titles with Stackhouse/Wallace and Carter/Jamison and honestly they had a point. We should've gotten a title or two out of those teams. But man, duke's current run of elite talent with no titles puts that to shame.

LOL, what? No one has said anything close to that.

When you have to keep blocking people you might be the dumbass.

Sean May joining Marcus Paige on Wes Miller's staff at UNCC. I hope these dudes kill it.

Not much of one. You poo on our best player after he plays an entire half with a broken arm and you don't even know "Tar Heels" is two words. Go root for duke already.

Here's where things stand currently...

You either cut down the nets or you don't. The rest is loser talk. We've cut down nets more recently than they have.

We literally have a more recent natty than they do. LOL

It would explain the seeming lack of urgency from UNC too. If they don't have some type of agreement in principle in place with somebody then I don't know what they're doing because it seems like they're just sitting around with their thumb up their ass.

I love how duke fans talk like they're the equivalent of Wooden's UCLA dynasty meanwhile they haven't won a title in over a decade while just operating as a one year pit stop for NBA lottery picks. They're Calipari's Memphis, not Wooden's UCLA.