LinvilleGorge

Sums up what my response was gonna be. LOL

Yeah, at this point we have the answer in Bryce IMO. He's TON of help to ein games as an NFL QB. Pn a rookie contract, cool. You have the cap flexibility to pay for that help. But give a guy like that a franchise QB contract and you just tied a cap noose around your neck that he can't overcome unless you absolutely knock it out of the park every year in the draft.

Rico is 0%. I think we would really like to have Mays back but we have a value in mind and aren't willing to overspend. I think someone probably will so I think the odds are pretty low but not zero.

Because this DL is completely reliant on Brown being available and being a stud. Without him we were the worst D in history. The Wharton signing last year reeked of desperation. He just isn't a great fit for us schematically and I think we panicked a little bit when we missed out on Milton Williams who would have been a great fit.

I appreciate the transparency but you're basically telling me you're forced to tailor your offense around your limitations at QB.

I was hoping one of he or Hill would be available at 51. I'm honestly not sure either will be.

I'm really rooting for Morgan. Loved him as a player and he just seems like a really good dude.

Coaching at Michigan seems like it requires a prerequisite of mistreating women. Good grief.

I wouldn't go that far simply because I think we need to sign a decent vet too. Sign a decent vet and draft three and you're standing a pretty good chance of cutting a draft pick.

Yeah, I was hoping to see significant improvement in Wallace this year. I'm pretty much always willing to give rookies a pass - especially a mid-rounder forced into a significant role put of the gate. Just show me some flashes and reason to hope there's something to build on. But when you still look like a week one rookie at the end of year two... ehhhhh... makes me wonder if there's anything there to continue to invest in. Going into year two in looking for more than flashes, I'm wanting to see some consistency and reliability and definitely by the end of year two. I just never saw it. He still looked like a rookie throughout.

I already had a DL penciled in for this draft but now it's practically guaranteed. It went from a quiet need that a lot of people were overlooking to a pretty pressing need without Robinson.

If we went LB at 19, the LB at 51 better be head and shoulders the BPA on our board. I was thinking more like 1st or 2nd and then double dipping in the mid-rounda But yeah, if we went LB back to back jn the 1st and 2nd and they turned out like Star and Short I don't think anyone would be complaining. Well, not many anyway. There's always gonna be a few no matter what. LOL

I'd be all for taking two LBs in this draft.

Penix had ridiculous production while Richardson and Levis had ridiculous physical tools. Simpson just seems very average across the board as an NFL prospect. He's just enjoying that "Bama bump" - Bryce also falls into that category.

Not to interrupt the middle aged horndog creeper fest turned Dr. Phil episode, but what about that NFL Combine in this here thread for talking about said event?