Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

kiper doesn't think panthers should take tackle at 28

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Toundra Newbie

Toundra

Posted
Posted

D Edwards and Cole started. They aren't doing a rotation at Tackle.

 

The starters are Edward and Star. not Cole.

In reality Short is the second starter.

Take a look at their stats..

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/car/carolina-panthers

 

Star and Short are way better than Edwards and Cole, how funny..

(don't get me wrong i love both Edwards and Cole)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

You do know his job is to analyze things right? Thats kinda all his mock is is a thermometer for the feel he has for the draft at that given time. He is not a fortune teller he talks to sources studys charts and makes predictions. I could fo a mock right now now and two days from noe s source feom one team could change my mock for every team completely.

Its a little strange for him to make say things about not seeing any OT worth us picking at 28 while your current and past mocks have us picking two different tackles without even mentioning or attempting to explain that shift. Its his explanation that is strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Gettleman would be a complete idiot to do so. He wont have a job long going bpa which is why we have 3 rbs and no wrs now. You cant keep stocking one position and ignoring the reason your not winning the super bowl in the First place.

 

No he wouldn't. I seriously doubt TD is on this team in two years. You have to prepare for the future as much as prepare for the present to stay competitive in the NFL. The only thing that would be idiotic would be reaching for an OT because "OMG ZORZ GUYS WE HAVE HOLEZ AT LT". That would be idiotic. Taking a talented player that can be a difference maker for 10 years? Yea, that sounds like a decent recipe for success...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No he wouldn't. I seriously doubt TD is on this team in two years. You have to prepare for the future as much as prepare for the present to stay competitive in the NFL. The only thing that would be idiotic would be reaching for an OT because "OMG ZORZ GUYS WE HAVE HOLEZ AT LT". That would be idiotic. Taking a talented player that can be a difference maker for 10 years? Yea, that sounds like a decent recipe for success...

It doesnt matter if your getting the same peice that your subbing out. Your just spinning your tires and left with the same holes just like we have had at wr for year. Bpa can only be successful within reasonable need. We cant draft another middle linbacker and hope to improve as a teamm getting the best players is a old school idea that some people took to literal. Yes you should try to get the best players but getting all linebacker types and asking them to help play say reciever is stupid. I agree we should not force a lt. But it has to come down to tackle or wr just that simple. Why improve on the leagues best defense whe your already stable there? Oh well td might be gone in 2 years... so deal with thay problem then dont draft backups when you need starters right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

It doesnt matter if your getting the same peice that your subbing out. Your just spinning your tires and left with the same holes just like we have had at wr for year. Bpa can only be successful within reasonable need. We cant draft another middle linbacker and hope to improve as a teamm getting the best players is a old school idea that some people took to literal. Yes you should try to get the best players but getting all linebacker types and asking them to help play say reciever is stupid. I agree we should not force a lt. But it has to come down to tackle or wr just that simple. Why improve on the leagues best defense whe your already stable there? Oh well td might be gone in 2 years... so deal with thay problem then dont draft backups when you need starters right now.

 

Go look at how the Seahawks have Drafted the last two years. Their perceived "needs" were OL and WR. You build the best 53 man roster possible and go to war. Give me a difference maker at LB over a second round OT who may not even be able to play OT any day of the week...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Go look at how the Seahawks have Drafted the last two years. Their perceived "needs" were OL and WR. You build the best 53 man roster possible and go to war. Give me a difference maker at LB over a second round OT who may not even be able to play OT any day of the week...

What good is a difference maker if he doesn't see the field? The seahawks were also one of the best teams in the league the last 2 years and did well in free agency. Ur talking about championship teams who are stocked going bpa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

What good is a difference maker if he doesn't see the field? The seahawks were also one of the best teams in the league the last 2 years and did well in free agency. Ur talking about championship teams who are stocked going bpa.

 

I'm talking about a team not Drafting for need and taking the highest player on the board. Look at the teams who Draft for need, most of them continue to do so in the top half of the Draft consistently. LOL if you think Shazier wouldn't see the field. That's hilarious...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm talking about a team not Drafting for need and taking the highest player on the board. Look at the teams who Draft for need, most of them continue to do so in the top half of the Draft consistently. LOL if you think Shazier wouldn't see the field. That's hilarious...

Thats where your wrong. Teams that consistently pick at the top dont do so for drafting for need they do it because they lack a franchise qb. Which is why wb usually goes one more consistently than any other position. The point being is why the flying fuge would we draft another lb when we dont need one? Yea h could be a good player but just be cause I got 4 dogs doesnt mean I should take another one just because hes free. Thats not helping the reason were losing now. We got giant forest fire disasters all over the rest of the team and you keep suggesting we ignore those issues just to try to win by adding a backup player?

Even if he is good as tou think he still doesnt start day one which is what the first round is for unless your the 49ers and seahawks who have drafted so well over the last few years they can do that. Were in cap hell havent hit on anything but first rounders and have lost some of the talent we had patching over those holes. News flash the reason we lost to the 49erz wasnt be cause we lacked another linebacker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Thats where your wrong. Teams that consistently pick at the top dont do so for drafting for need they do it because they lack a franchise qb. Which is why wb usually goes one more consistently than any other position. The point being is why the flying fuge would we draft another lb when we dont need one? Yea h could be a good player but just be cause I got 4 dogs doesnt mean I should take another one just because hes free. Thats not helping the reason were losing now. We got giant forest fire disasters all over the rest of the team and you keep suggesting we ignore those issues just to try to win by adding a backup player?

Even if he is good as tou think he still doesnt start day one which is what the first round is for unless your the 49ers and seahawks who have drafted so well over the last few years they can do that. Were in cap hell havent hit on anything but first rounders and have lost some of the talent we had patching over those holes. News flash the reason we lost to the 49erz wasnt be cause we lacked another linebacker.

 

No I'm suggesting not reaching for a dude because he plays a certain position. It's really not that fuging difficult to understand. If you have a top 15-20 player and a player ranked in the 40-50 range you take the top 15....that's simple. I really don't know why it's hard to understand Dave Gettleman is just as concerned in building for the future as he is in building for the present. He's said it at almost every press conference. I get it, you don't think Shazier will get on the field. I just don't think you understand how good Shazier is. It's not like I'm saying draft a LB just for the sake of drafting a LB. I'm saying go and get a difference maker instead of a JAG. You don't win football games because of JAG's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Thats where your wrong. Teams that consistently pick at the top dont do so for drafting for need they do it because they lack a franchise qb. Which is why wb usually goes one more consistently than any other position. The point being is why the flying fuge would we draft another lb when we dont need one? Yea h could be a good player but just be cause I got 4 dogs doesnt mean I should take another one just because hes free. Thats not helping the reason were losing now. We got giant forest fire disasters all over the rest of the team and you keep suggesting we ignore those issues just to try to win by adding a backup player?

Even if he is good as tou think he still doesnt start day one which is what the first round is for unless your the 49ers and seahawks who have drafted so well over the last few years they can do that. Were in cap hell havent hit on anything but first rounders and have lost some of the talent we had patching over those holes. News flash the reason we lost to the 49erz wasnt be cause we lacked another linebacker.

 

DP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Dave Tepper gives Canales and Dan Morgan vote of confidence

      By frankw · Posted

      You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Mcshay Unsure T-mac is a wr 1 or X..

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      Tuka fan when a TMac thread pops up
    • TD alt
      Mcshay Unsure T-mac is a wr 1 or X..

      By TD alt · Posted

      It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
×
×
  • Create New...