Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scholarly research: Risk at Positions of Need (heavy reading)


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Definitely high. I'm not sure he has as much immediate impact potential as the top tackles, but he strikes me as a great 'long term' choice.

Not familiar with that particular site, but I prefer the 'full game' type videos where you can watch an entire performance.

You would love that site then...they have full game tapes of prospects "cut up" to make it to where you can see a players every snap in games in a a few minutes.O-lineman obviously show u every offensive snap but they still consolidate to a matter of minutes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would love that site then...they have full game tapes of prospects "cut up" to make it to where you can see a players every snap...I-lineman obviously show u every offensive snap but they still consolidate to a matter of minutes

 

I'll check it out.

 

I don't care for "highlight reel" scouting where you just see all the good plays.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll check it out.

I don't care for "highlight reel" scouting where you just see all the good plays.

Exactly! That site is amazing come draft time...I visit it more than any others when forming opinions on prospects. Literally shows you every snap from full games good and bad...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Marcus Martin thread you were arguing with JOAT that reaching for need was better than going BPA.

 

 

 

So which is it?

 

Well sir it depends because the talent is deeper at wr doesn't mean we should take some 3rd round tackle because everyone feels we should. I just don't think we need to grab a lesser talent in a draft where the pick is just not there. I'm all for getting moses if he is there but,all this benito and turner talk is getting out of hand. With the injuries to thomas and cyrus i just don't think the value is going to be there at tackle.My point was to grab need within reason. The sky is not falling just because gross is gone and i think cyrus will be there in the second(maybe not when we pick).  I don't see any agruement you can make that makes grabing anyone out side of lewhan martin or moses possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well sir it depends because the talent is deeper at wr doesn't mean we should take some 3rd round tackle because everyone feels we should. I just don't think we need to grab a lesser talent in a draft where the pick is just not there. I'm all for getting moses if he is there but,all this benito and turner talk is getting out of hand. With the injuries to thomas and cyrus i just don't think the value is going to be there at tackle.My point was to grab need within reason. The sky is not falling just because gross is gone and i think cyrus will be there in the second(maybe not when we pick). I don't see any agruement you can make that makes grabing anyone out side of lewhan martin or moses possible.

If Gett takes either of then at 28, then I guarantee one thing...they did NOT have a 3rd round grade on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Gett takes either of then at 28, then I guarantee one thing...they did NOT have a 3rd round grade on them.

Well lets hope getts knows something most of the recruiting world doesn't know. I understand the need for a franchise tackle I am not a scout by any means,I just dont see a first round tackle being there when we pick. Let's see If he holds true to his BPA rehash that he tells the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...