Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cats vs Hawks 4/14


Omega Atrocity

Recommended Posts

I'm just saying if you replace him, it's got to be a player that can fill his role defensively so the defense isn't horrendous.

It can't be a offensive strong, defensively limited player like Hayward. Who isn't a very good perimeter defender. That's all I'm getting at, you just can't replace him with a shooter.

 

I understand what you are saying.  But, it is very difficult to give minutes to a strong defenisive player that is so inept on the offensive end.

 

It is one thing to be a defensive specialist, but you can be only that and get big minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying. But, it is very difficult to give minutes to a strong defenisive player that is so inept on the offensive end.

It is one thing to be a defensive specialist, but you can be only that and get big minutes.

The system is built around having a fast agile defensive specialist on the floor to protect Jefferson in p&r situations. Doesn't have to be a player limited offensively, but they would need to be a defensive stopper first and foremost.

Either that or the system would need to be changed to accommodate for that while still hiding Jefferson on Defense. Defensive stopper would still have to be on the floor but could be at the 2 or 4 instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The system is built around having a fast agile defensive specialist on the floor to protect Jefferson in p&r situations.

 

I understand the system.  But that defensive specialist STILL needs to be somewhat of an offensive threat.  Otherwise, they are playing 5 against 4 when we are on offense.

 

MKG needs to develop at least a marginal offensive game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the system. But that defensive specialist STILL needs to be somewhat of an offensive threat. Otherwise, they are playing 5 against 4 when we are on offense.

MKG needs to develop at least a marginal offensive game.

. My phone posted a half way done post, I was getting at the fact that it doesn't mean the player has to be completely limited offensively, but still be a defensive stopper.

Hopefully MKG can fix his shot an develop a reliable jumpshot .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MKG just needs to get out of this FT slump, he's finally starting to get a couple calls so even if he can hit like 60% of them I think he can get us 10 ppg in the playoffs. Add that to 7-8 rebounds, a couple assists, and all he brings on the defensive end, he can certainly be an asset in the postseason.

We really don't even need him to score much to be successful with his all-around game and guys like Jefferson, Kemba, Hendo, and Neal hopefully accounting for the bulk of the scoring.

He was actually our second-leading scorer among starters last night (only 8, but that is more telling of the other guys) and added 9 rebounds and 3 assists. The reason we nearly blew this was because Kemba and Hendo couldn't score, so discussing MKG's scoring ineptitude puzzles me.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tetairoa McMillan.   The last 28 1st overall picks were either a QB, DE, or OT. Seeing as I don't think we'd take an OT in the 1st and give up on Ickey as an LT yet and there doesn't seem to be a clear overall #1 type of QB or DE pick this year, it very well could be a non conventional #1 overall this year, at least in regards from the last almost 3 decades of drafts. If we didn't have Horn, I'd be more open to Hunter as a CB at #1, but we have him so another CB wouldn't be how I'd use a #1 pick.  And as much as I love Legette, if we have SB contending aspirations, I don't think Legette is a #1 on a team like that, but he damn sure is an elite #2 on a team like that.  He's more of the Smith/Higgins/Waddle to Brown/Chase/Hill (in terms of role/impact, not style of play of course). T-Mac is going to be the top ranked WR on every team's board in the end.  He is going to be a true outside #1 WR who is viewed as a consensus Top 5 WR in the game by his second contract in the same way guys like Jefferson and Chase have done.  His height combined with his speed, athleticism, and hands are near impossible to find all in one player, there is a reason his generally used comp is Mike Evans (although as he's not as thick, I personally see him more as an AJ Green). Yes, as an Arizona alum I've admitted to having bias towards the player to begin with.  But he's also someone very widely being put into the Top 5 in mock drafts lately and most of them have him as the first non QB offensive player being taken, so it's not really THAT much of a homer pick on my part anyways. If a QB or DE truly separate themselves as being a can't miss prospect come draft day, I'm open to that discussion, but until then, or if it doesn't happen, T-Mac is my pick 100 times out of 100.
    • Logjam, indeed! Makes me nervous.
×
×
  • Create New...