Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TNT Gives Bobcats No Respect


Recommended Posts

I was watching Inside NBA on TNT and the guys just utterly disrespected the Bobcats.

- Here is the preface, Ernie Johnson brought up the Eastern Conference Playoffs.

- Chuck then said that Toronto was a scary team and that they were going to win a series.

- EJ replied, that the matchup would be Charlotte vs. Toronto.

- Shaq laughed, Chuck said that Toronto was going to beat Charlotte.

- To be fair, Kenny picked Charlotte to beat Toronto.

We're still getting no respect... it's time to kick ass and prove the haters wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are still the laughing stock of american sports. There's no reason for anyone to give us any respect.

I'll just be glad when the season is over and we are officially the Hornets. The Bobcats name just has too much negative crap associated with it.

You've said a lot of things I disagree with, but this is dead on.

I wouldn't consider most NBA fans as avid fans, most are just bandwagon and because of this the Bobcats name gets associated with sucking no matter how well we play.

I still see comments like "how are the Knicks losing to the Bobcats?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've said a lot of things I disagree with, but this is dead on.

I wouldn't consider most NBA fans as avid fans, most are just bandwagon and because of this the Bobcats name gets associated with sucking no matter how well we play.

I still see comments like "how are the Knicks losing to the Bobcats?"

Go check out the Wizards forums. They were wanting their coach fired yesterday after losing to "a shitty ass joke of a team" they were mad that their Wizards lost 3 of 4 to the crappy Bobcats who they view as a far inferior team.

A lot of it is just ignorance of people who know nothing, but it is also simply the Bobcats brand being associated with losing for a decade and thus it's entire existence. Each league has it; NFL- Jaguars, MLB- Royals, NBA- Bobcats.

The good news is the Hornets name is one of the most popular and liked across the country. Causal fans of teams all over the country were happy to see the Charlotte Hornets return. As long as the team keeps winning the stigma and reputation will quickly disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It honestly doesn't matter to me that people still disrespect the Bobcats for two reasons:

 

(1) we're less than two full seasons removed from a season where we only won 7 games, and last season was rough too.  I can't get too annoyed with non-fans that are biased against a franchise that has recently had historically awful seasons and has an extended history of being a sub-average team.

 

(2) I know that times have changed, and our current worse case scenario is now treadmill late seed playoff team.  I'm all in on Clifford and our core, and we still have players developing and assets to enhance the roster.  The days of being an NBA laughing stock are over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Barkley's opinion, that a team with a better record than yours will beat you, disrespect? You even said another's opinion was that the Cats would win.

It wasn't the fact that he thought they would win, it was the way he dismissed the possibility of us even being in the series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are still the laughing stock of american sports. There's no reason for anyone to give us any respect.

I'll just be glad when the season is over and we are officially the Hornets. The Bobcats name just has too much negative crap associated with it.

I wouldn't say we're the laughing stock of american sports.  I think we have more fans then the Jags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Barkley's opinion, that a team with a better record than yours will beat you, disrespect? You even said another's opinion was that the Cats would win.

It was more or less the way it was said...

Ernie had to look down on his paper to check the standings to see who Toronto would play and once he found it, he said Charlotte and while Shaq laughed, Barkley said "oh, they gonna beat them."

Completely writing us off, giving us no chance... yet he thinks Memphis stands a chance against the Spurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did we take over a thread about who you'd take #1 by having a debate on who you'd take #1? Basically you still don't want to answer my question, probably because your answer would be either T-Mac like myself, or Hunter, which taking a CB #1 overall is even crazier on the surface than what you're saying I'm stupid for in wanting a WR there. As I've said before, it's a season without a traditional clear top pick(s).  It would be great if we could trade back if we got #1, but if not, there's nothing wrong with taking a truly elite WR and build out our roster correctly for once instead of always trying to find the quick fix and it backfiring. 
    • I just thought of an interesting comparison for what I'm arguing with taking T-Mac and how to build up to hopefully being a contender. The mid 2000's Arizona Cardinals In 2003 they took Anquan Boldin early in the 2nd, kinda a decent comp for Legette with style of play and being more of an elite #2 than a true outside #1 (they also took a WR in the 1st too who didn't pan out). In 2004 they took Larry Fitzgerald #3 overall, the true outside #1. Their QB's at the time, Jeff Blake and Josh McCown The QB they passed on to take Fizgerald, Philip Rivers. They were in the Super Bowl a few years later after they found their QB in Warner to slot into an already built out roster of elite weapons. Cam, you asked how it would look if we passed on a QB who pans out for a WR, well, do you think the Cardinals regret taking Fitz over Rivers?  I highly doubt it. Our roster is more than one offseason away from contending.  I'm not looking for the quick fix because there isn't one with the state of this franchise at the moment, I'm looking to contend for a decade. I don't think a QB in this draft class is good enough to take 1st overall with everything else we still need.  My next preference would be an elite pass rusher, but again, I don't see one of them in this draft either. My personal bias aside, I very honestly think T-Mac is the most can't miss offensive prospect in this draft (Hunter would be that on defense).  He is the WR we've been trying to get since we lost Smitty.   Brooks, T-Mac, Legette, Coker/FA, Sanders would have the potential to be one of the best offensive weapon sets in the NFL.  Sure, hopefully we could hit on a superstar QB in the next draft, but even if not, if those guys pan out, with them all are in their prime together, we wouldn't need a Mahomes or Allen to contend, we'd only need to find our Jared Goff. and spend all our FA money the next couple offseason on Defense.
    • Competent QBs can read defenses presnap, see where their best matchups are and already know where they're going with the ball. Then have good footwork with fast fundamentally sound dropbacks. See the field well and decisive with their decisions on where to go with the ball. And an NFL caliber arm, get the ball out quickly and deliver it with velocity. Bryce can do none of these things.
×
×
  • Create New...