Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lower-key bar/restaurant in Charlotte with a nice patio...


Donald LaFell

Recommended Posts

Looking for something like the title. Preferably with a view, and preferably far away from the Baseball stadium since I know it's going to be packed on Friday!

 

Anybody know of any good spots. It's for a first date.  Just need somewhere for drinks and conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try Vivace at the Metropolitan. It's got a pretty good churn inside, but the patio is great and it's a great place for a date. Great food(Appetizers and flat bread pizzas if you want to keep it simple/affordable), great wine list, it looks out over downtown and the greenway.

 

http://vivacecharlotte.com/

 

If you're both more into craft beers, etc. you could also try the Peculiar Rabbit over off Thomas St./Plaza Midwood area. Great appetizers/food, drink list and the top floor has patio dining with one of the best views of downtown I've seen from a restaurant in a long time.

 

http://www.thepeculiarrabbit.com/#!the_brewery/c1pwt

 

Both of these places have extensive drink lists and great appetizers. If the date goes really well, they both have great entrees/desserts in case you decide to stay longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vivace has an upstairs patio as well, no?

 

Yes, but they often book it for private groups, and one side is open to the rest of the upstairs seating, which can be pretty loud. Unless it's super windy, my wife and I usually prefer the portion of the patio facing the greenway.

 

Also, if OP is just looking for beers/bar food, the Hickory Tavern right next door has a patio as well. We've caught a couple of Panthers games there and had good experiences each time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...