Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prepare the Anus: NC DOT wants to charge you $0.005 for every mile you drive


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Good chance it will pass... It seems NC hikes tax on something every 6 months.  At this rate we'll be the heaviest taxed state in the US.

 

 

 

RALEIGH, N.C. —

North Carolina Department of Transportation board members will hear a presentation Wednesday on a proposal to tax people based on the number of miles they drive.

It's an idea that didn't sit well with Henry Martin.

"Everything is taxed. Most of the highway belongs to me anyway, all the taxes I done paid in these years," he said.

Angela Vogel-Daley with AAA Carolinas thinks a mileage tax will be complicated to implement and costly.

"You'd either need to track your car where you drove, where would those miles go towards?" she said. "Would they go toward state, local, or federal government? If you do an odometer reading it's simpler but it could still be complicated and more of the revenue may go to administrative costs rather than funding the roads."

Vogel-Daley thinks increasing the gas tax would be the simplest alternative to generate funds.

Currently North Carolina drivers pay one of the highest rates in the country at just over 37 cents per gallon at the pump.

NCDOT said the proposed mileage tax would generate around $500 million a year, charging drivers a half cent per mile.

It pales in comparison to the $2.8 billion in state and federal dollars currently generated from the gas tax.

As cars become more fuel-efficient and driving habits change, money generated from the gas tax will likely decrease by 2018.

"The gas tax is not the vehicle that is the right tool for the job going forward," NCDOT Chief Financial Officer Mark Foster said.

Foster said regardless of what the NCDOT decides, transportation is a huge part of the economy and ultimately the state will need several tools to fund it into the future.

Click here to look at the Enhancement Revenue Study the NCDOT board will hear about tomorrow that explores the impact of a proposed state mileage tax.

 

 

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/ncdot-looking-tax-drivers-every-mile-they-drive/nfP3z/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what would prevent someone from disabling the odometer for half the year and paying half the tax? Or someone with an old car, like mine, that does not have a working odometer?

 

This tax is just a pipe dream thought up by someone who realized that more efficient cars means less gas tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way to enforce this tax. As Panthro said, why should you pay NC a tax for miles you drove on roads in other states. What about people who live in SC and work in NC or vice versa? A tax on car rental miles would make sense, but that would in no way make up the lost revenue from more efficient cars. 

 

This could never replace the tax on gas, it would have to be about 6 times more, or .03/mile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a way to do this tax, but no one would like it. And I mean no one, the privacy issues would never let it pass, and it is waaaay to 1984ish, but the solution would be...............

 

Mandatory GPS installed on all vehicles. Can't pass inspection unless you have one. A system would have to be built to monitor and track each person's mileage, then you would be able to send one bill each year, and you could even divide it up by county if so desired. You coul exclude al miles outside of the state. You would just have to worry about hackers screwing with the GPS systems.

 

Not saying I advocate this, but it would really be the only feasible option to ensure that the tax is applied equitably to everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...