Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Camp forum feedback....


Zod

Recommended Posts

It's not as nice as having people post their report in one post, as in the past.

That being said, you do get up to date info.

Agreed.

The up to date info is great to read as the day goes by, but I would still love to see people's thoughts brought together at the end of each session to get a full run down of what each person saw, like last season. I think it would feasible for those to go hand in hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the information is a little too spread out. Is there a way to have just one thread for all the twitter updates in a day?

And when a new day of camp starts, so also a new thread is started. Seems things would be better organized that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed.

The up to date info is great to read as the day goes by, but I would still love to see people's thoughts brought together at the end of each session to get a full run down of what each person saw, like last season. I think it would feasible for those to go hand in hand.

Definitely agree that the two together will be great. Up to date info, then reports at the end of the day/practice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.

While the Tweets leave something to be desired, it's unrealistic to expect a full article every five minutes. The Tweets give us some nice, specific notes from training camp, and then hopefully we'll get some more in-depth accounts -- both from Huddlers and the beat writers -- later in the day.

But yeah, I'm diggin' it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...