Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any stand up paddle boarders up in here?


pstall

Recommended Posts

Been looking to buy one and I may have found a deal but not sure if the quality is good.

 

It's a Freestyle stand up and is brand new. Someone is trying to off load it.

 

Anybody have any exp with Freestyle SUP at all?

 

Go for it if the price is reasonable..........don't like it, sell it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume your talking about the brand lifetime and the model freestyle. .if not then this has no point lol. Im not familiar with freestyle if its a brand.

Anyways the freestyle (lifetime products in general) sup isn't a bad but its not great either but they are a good bang for the buck.

Lifetime products are sporting items that big box stores carry if that makes sense

For a beginner its a good one to start with and use for a while and see if your really into it. If so, it will be good for a while but you would probably want to upgrade in 2 years or so for something better. Something that is lighter and tracks better. However if you used it under 5 times a year it should last a longtime.

They have retailed for 400 but I wouldn't pay over 300 for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paddle boards are essentially everywhere now.  It's OK to go with mass-manufactured brands for sake of price and learning.  You will probably want to upgrade after a season of learning and practicing anyway, and it will last longer than that.  I would say go for it everything else being equal.  If you get really interested, there are local surf shops on the coast that make their own boards, and they are starting to make stand-up paddle boards.  Check in those areas for custom, "local" supply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...