Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 Receivers don't grow on trees, I'm told

ed bell

By ed bell,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ed bell Newbie

ed bell

Posted
Posted

So where do they come from and are they all the same? What does it look like the Panthers are going to do to get one? Our current situation and these WR threads have me stuck on this..... Just thinking out loud here.

A WR1 is either: A) drafted and immediately shows themselves ready, B) developed and grown over time to assume the role on the team that drafts them, C) a player capable of being one, but unproven due to depth chart (the diamond in the rough), or D) a proven veteran.

Since free agency is open now, but we haven't drafted yet, there is uncertainty here as to what the plan is for the Panthers. Most would agree that if you need a WR#1 for 2014 you can either buy the proven free-agent, draft a candidate, or gamble on an unproven player either on the roster, or free-agent. I've seen it boil down to Hakeem Nicks (gone), Kenny Britt, and DeSean Jackson for proven veterans. Each day that passes seems to make this route less likely. Personally I'm fine with that option being taken off the table.

This is where it gets complicated for us. The fact that Olsen was practically our WR#1 in production last year makes me think we would settle for a "wait and see" attitude with our draft picks and available players. In other words, we don't necessarily need a full blown WR#1 considering Greg Olson's role. While it would be awesome to have an elite WR#1, I don't believe that is a priority for this team this year anyway. Too many other concerns are lingering.

My take is that we will draft a WR in the first or second and hope for a home run. But if that doesn't materialize we will see a "by committee" WR corps this season. Maybe using a yet to be acquired FA not on the market yet. Not exactly what anyone wants, but maybe something that ends up working just well enough to get the job done. This also could result in a player growing into the position.

I want the WR#1 question answered just as much as the next guy, but I'm preparing myself for the scenario above. Considering our roster/money situation, I'm also OK with that. Unfortunately, not everyone is going to agree with me. Bring on the draft, please. It can't get here soon enough. I'm hoping that first day will bring us the answer we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

I see lots of talk about this mythical "#1 WR".  What exactly is that?  How many elite #1 WRs are there in the NFL?  5?  10?  At this point, I'd be happy with simply fielding a good NFL WR corps.  We haven't provided Cam Newton with one of those since we drafted him.  If that includes a true elite #1 WR, great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Huddler Veteran

The Huddler

Posted
Posted

To me, a number one is a WR that always demands double coverage, but still gets the job done and puts up big numbers.

Technically, anyone would be considered a #1 if they are the best on the roster, but to me, a true #1 could be defined by one word:

Stud.

Edit: ^^^ like this guy said, like 5-10 studs? I've grew up with Steve smith, who in his time was a true #1. IDC if there are only 5-10 in the NFL, I want to snag one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackofalltrades Community Regular

Jackofalltrades

Posted
Posted

Agree with Linville, Cam made major improvements last season in ball distribution. A good all around corps would really allow Cam to maximize his potential and not allow defenses to key on one guy. I think Olsen and Cotchery are a good, savvy and reliable tandem. Underwood will open things up underneath and I have no idea what King and McNutt bring, though I like their speed/size combo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

It seems like every HOF QB had a HOF WR to work with

 

Brett Favre?  He had Randy Moss for a couple of years at the tail end of both of their careers, but during his prime he never had a HOFer in his WR corps.  He had several really good ones like Sterling Sharpe, Antonio Freeman, and Javon Walker, but none of those guys will end up in Canton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Community Regular

Montsta

Posted
Posted

I looked at past career numbers, and using a reasonable increase or reasonable expectation for ball distribution, I think Cam has 3K passing yards easily with Olsen (850), Cotchery (700), The Hair (500), and ~300 each from Tolbert, Stewart and Williams.

So if we can draft a guy that can get another 700 or so as a rookie, and get even moderate production from a 2nd TE, then I think Cam eclipses the 4K mark again for the first time since he was a rookie. As far as I'm concerned that is a recipe for success. If we have our offense from Cam's rookie year with this defense, we win Superbowls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      Redzone Offense vs. KC by drive

      By Icege · Posted

      NFL Pro has the All-22 up already 😄 Going to grab a play or two from each redzone series to put screenshots to. Looks like AT angled his route off to the near pylon rather than the back corner where Bryce was throwing to. I imagine this is something they'll quickly try to figure out with Thielen back from IR. After watching the All-22 again, this was actually a pretty nifty play. I thought it was a TE screen to Tremble because of the way XL charged the DB, but he quickly shed and kept upfield as seen in the second screenshot. This looks like it had multiple layers built into it with AT running the crosser, XL the fade, Tremble to the flat. The progression would call for the play to go to Chuba here as the LB does follow Tremble out into the flat. Ball hits Chuba low and in the hands, but the LB does a good job disrupting the catch.
    • Luuuuuuuuuuke59
      Crazy stat

      By Luuuuuuuuuuke59 · Posted

      The bottom lines to me are that a) we played well enough to beat the best team in the league and b) Bryce Young is growing into a bridge QB role (his ceiling) for us. As much as I don't want BY around after the season, it seems DC can still build the O with a game manager at QB for now. Best case scanario, we can build the D through the draft this year and take a QB we have conviction outside the 1st this or next draft. If BY keeps improving, we are going to win a couple more games this year.
    • *FreeFua*
      Bryce developing before our eyes

      By *FreeFua* · Posted

      Bryce has been a completely different QB since coming back. That started in Denver where it was obviously he was playing a lot more loose and willing to push the ball downfield  Bryce continues to build off of the previous weeks performance and that’s what you want to see Bryce has been making some real good anticipation throws. Reading defenses well. Pushing the ball downfield (7 throws of 20+ air yards yesterday. 8 if you want to include PI to Thielen). The deep ball accuracy has been there. Some of Young’s best throws yesterday were incompletions. Sideline balls to XL and Moore both should’ve been caught. RZ dot to Tremble should’ve been caught. And another RZ ball to Moore that Young gave him a chance at. Bryce is starting to execute Canales offense and yesterday Canales finally opened it up a bit. Canales was to blame for the 126 passing yards in Germany as he played a more conservative game.  The next bit I’m looking for his for Young to be a bit more decisive with running the ball. Start putting that on film and it’ll help open things up a tad
×
×
  • Create New...