Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A bit of news on D-Jax


dugbug

Recommended Posts

I get the impression that gettleman prefers to sign two year deals with most of these guys so we don't have to go through this whole process over and over every year. Nicks probably didn't want anything more than one year at a lowered rate. cotchery and Harper have both been willing to sign for more than one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's as simple as gettleman saw smitty as a distraction and decided to cut him. It was a combination of age, production, contract and the "distraction" part of it as well. For example, Gettleman would not be releasing a 27 year old smitty because he is a "distraction" 

 

I agree 100%. Please remember that  I said "IF it is true...". 

 

All you really have to do is look at the contract beyond 2014 and see how it escalated as he aged to realize this was a necessary move.  The fact that he did not ask him to take a cut (I think--who knows the real truth?) or discuss other similar options is curious.  We really do not know what was going on behind closed doors.  I can see that Smitty would be a difficult teammate to have.  We loved him, but we didn't have to work with him every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britt, Jackson--the fact that these 2 very talented guys were/are not wanted by their teams speaks volumes.  IF it is true that Gettlemen thought Smitty was a distraction and cut him, I do not see him bringing in one of these gems.  Nor do I see us surrendering a 3rd rounder to get him.

I agree with that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...