Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interested in DeSean Jackson for the right price...


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

I would love if we are the actual favorites to land him if he is traded, as the NFLN reporter stated, but here's where that doesn't make sense to me...  Both the Raiders and the Jets have significantly higher picks than we do if we're all offering 3rd rounders, AND I wouldn't put it past either of them to offer up to a 2nd for him.

 

I'd say if they want to offer a 2nd they can have him...  But if they want to offer a similar package, I wouldn't dismiss the notion of offering our 3rd and a 6 or 7, or some such...

 

The first thing DJ would demand would be to rework his current contract..  This would be where it potentially would work in favor for Carolina...  Give him a lower base salary, and more guaranteed money, and he's probably content for another couple years...  Keep the contract short (2-3 years), and it won't matter if he bitches all that much, as he would be close to Free Agency by that point anyway...

 

Add in some of the dead money coming off the books, and substantial cap increases the next 2 years, and this starts to feel a bit more realistic...

 

In the end, I believe it's a long shot, but if we're able to pull this off it certainly turns a negative into a positive for us...

 

I love the offseason!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love if we are the actual favorites to land him if he is traded, as the NFLN reporter stated, but here's where that doesn't make sense to me... Both the Raiders and the Jets have significantly higher picks than we do if we're all offering 3rd rounders, AND I wouldn't put it past either of them to offer up to a 2nd for him.

Well if the jets get him, it becomes 10 times more likely that we get cooks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love if we are the actual favorites to land him if he is traded, as the NFLN reporter stated, but here's where that doesn't make sense to me...  Both the Raiders and the Jets have significantly higher picks than we do if we're all offering 3rd rounders, AND I wouldn't put it past either of them to offer up to a 2nd for him.

 

That's where the headache factor Jackson brings might work to our advantage. If he really really doesn't want to play for the Raiders or Jets, we could be the only viable option left. After all, wouldn't DeSean Jackson make us a...dare I say it?...Super Bowl contender? Just missing a left tackle. We'd certainly be closer than the Jets or Raiders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...