Trade Target: Denarius Moore?

[KillerKat]

Denarious Moore + Raiders 2nd for Hardy, done deal

This is exactly what I was thinking minus the 2nd. Raiders probably wouldn't give up a 2nd. Hell, I'd be fine with just the player trade as long as it means we get rid of that 13 mil tag. Anything else is just icing.

[PantherWake]

Well, I wouldn't be able to argue it isn't a need.  The needs are starting to outnumber the known commodities.

 

Yeah I've never rooted for a team that felt like it was rebuilding after being a Top 5 team the previous year.

[jptaylor84]

I'm actually confused right now! I've defended gettleman but I honestly did think we would not only get james jones but we needed him as some sort of experience with quality to play at receiver, now I look at lots of players and think what are we doing where are we going with this?

[carolina-chuck]

Denarious Moore + Raiders 2nd for Hardy, done deal

Fug no!

[Fox007]

Fug no!

 

 

Funny how the same type of people talking poo about Gettleman are coming up with bullshit trades like Hardy For Moore + a 2nd rounder...rofl.

 

Those fools would be fired in 30 minutes if they were given the reins to a team...huddle has never been this low.

[top dawg]

I've been calling for a Moore trade since before the deadline last season. My idea of trading a 5th for Moore to replace their 5th round pick is a much better idea.

[Jackofalltrades]

Yes.

[top dawg]

Because I've mentioned Moore so much, I finally thought that this thread would say something more concrete, and was sorely disappointed when I opened it, and nothing...

 

 

Talking about one big PSYCHE!

[El Chingon]

I would hate to give up a draft pick this year since the WR position is very strong. You could get a starting WR in the 4th round. 

[Gin and Juice]

Gettleman is gonna draft nothing but WR and OL in the draft. He aint trading for nobody.

As long as they are the BPA

[top dawg]

I would hate to give up a draft pick this year since the WR position is very strong. You could get a starting WR in the 4th round. 

 

Perhaps.  But Moore has plenty of professional stating experience and has shown that he can make big plays.  He would definitely be a starter. Honestly I would probably give a 4th for him, but a 5th (which is what they are missing) would be a no-brainer in my book.

[t96]

This is exactly what I was thinking minus the 2nd. Raiders probably wouldn't give up a 2nd. Hell, I'd be fine with just the player trade as long as it means we get rid of that 13 mil tag. Anything else is just icing.

 

No way, Hardy's definitely worth at least a 1st or 2nd round and Moore would just be icing if they wanted to get rid of him. A Moore for Hardy straight up would suck.

[52Beast]

I would hate to give up a draft pick this year since the WR position is very strong. You could get a starting WR in the 4th round. 

 

Hypothetically, he's saying you can give up a 5th round pick for a starting receiver....so in that scenario, why not make that trade?

[KillerKat]

No way, Hardy's definitely worth at least a 1st or 2nd round and Moore would just be icing if they wanted to get rid of him. A Moore for Hardy straight up would suck.

Not if it would allow you to actually fill holes