Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You guys are seriously thinking the Saints win the division because of the Byrd signing?


Rags

Recommended Posts

Even though they did this season what we're complaining about what we might do to Smith?

 

They cut a shitton of their core players on offense and defensive, make it seem like it's for their best offensive weapon, and the poo it all out on a Saftey, despite the fact they now have glaring holes elsewhere.

 

2014 NFCS champs ya'll.

 

Calm your tits. It's just the first day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though they did this season what we're complaining about what we might do to Smith?

 

They cut a shitton of their core players on offense and defensive, make it seem like it's for their best offensive weapon, and the poo it all out on a Saftey, despite the fact they now have glaring holes elsewhere.

 

2015 NFCS champs ya'll.

 

Calm your tits. It's just the first day.

 

They won the division this season? Could have sworn the Panthers did.

 

2015 NFCS champs? I want to win 2014 first and foremost but I like the optimism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you read that here on teh Huddle?

 

Lots of over reactions because "Everyone in our division is getting better"  posts and someone even said we're going to be the 3rd worse team in the nfl next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They won the division this season? Could have sworn the Panthers did.

2015 NFCS champs? I want to win 2014 first and foremost but I like the optimism.

He was saying that they cut core players not that they won the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They won the division this season? Could have sworn the Panthers did.

 

2015 NFCS champs? I want to win 2014 first and foremost but I like the optimism. 

 

I have no idea how the NFL works because apprently this season is last season and when you refer to "This season" you you mean 2014-2015? Idk 

 

and I acidentally hit 4 instead of 5 whoops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I think after this year the Saints are done. I'm more worried about the Bucs.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

I'm worried about the Bucs, more than anyone. They finally have a very good coach, and they're getting better on defense. The Saints I ain't worried about because they're getting older (the whole team), even though Byrd does make them better in the backfield. 

 

The Falcons 34 might be something to take note of this season (mainly because we have an increasingly shitty offensive line). But, you know. Matt Ryan is going to choke at some point or other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really think the Bucs will be in the running for it... I just don't see us near the top at the moment. We've lost a lot and gained hardly anything

 

It's Day 1.

 

We were saying the same thing last year.

 

The draft hasn't even happened yet.

 

I agree though, the Bucs look the scariest in our division now. They are the most loaded team talent wise and Lovie Smith is smart enough to put it together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • True.  Sam and Baker did not do well here but went on to better things under better coaching, circumstances or both.  The real question is, ‘why aren’t the Panthers able to get improved performance out of ‘broken toys’, similar to Minnesota and Tampa? That is a rhetorical question.  I think we know the answer.   [The cultural reference to Pogo dates me, I admit.]
    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
×
×
  • Create New...