Steve Smith or Hakeem Nicks.

[jarhead]

Gabbert only played 3 games last year.

Ponder completed 64% of his passes, which is 7% better than Eli, & he had a much better TD-t/o ratio.

I'll give you Geno, he sucked.

Point remains, Steve played with a Pro Bowler last year & Hakeem played with one of the absolute worst QBs in the league. And their production was very similar.

Only an idiot would rather have Smith going forward. It has nothing to do with Steve's past. Him being the greatest panther isn't gonna win games going forward.

A big, physical 26yo with elite WR skills would.

Well I guess I am an idiot with company. 

[jarhead]

Steve Smith puts up Brandon LaFell production with a Top 10 WR cap hit....

Only a Panther Homer would pick him over Nicks. Go to the other 31 board & they'll all laugh & say Nicks.

 

[Pox 08]

Rivera and Gman are going to move SS89 to the slot..  I feel it in my gut...  they are going to evaluate and come to the conclusion that we have all known for the last two years,  that 89 is no longer a legit #1 WR.                        

This off-season will revolve around finding a legit #1 WR and building a solid Oline.            So..... Nicks and it's not even close.    Nicks or any other #1 WR. 

[Pox 08]

How hard must it be for a qb to try and hit a short wr that can no longer get open?

 

 

Also,  would give anything if we could get a time machine and pluck 24 yr old SS89 out of the past and bring him to the present for Cam.

[NFLFangirl19]

How hard must it be for a qb to try and hit a short wr that can no longer get open?

Also, would give anything if we could get a time machine and pluck 24 yr old SS89 out of the past and bring him to the present for Cam.

Could he not get open or did Cam overthrow him?...hmmm

[MV%doe]

Funny because I've actually pondered this very scenario. (Losing Smith and signing Nicks that is) & I've been on the bring Nicks home train since watching him back in 2011, tbh. But even w/ that being said there is no way in hell I would be happy w/ losing Smith in order to get him. Ecsp after the last 2 questionable seasons he's had. Don't get me wrong having him here would be amazing because i believe all he needs is a change if scenery to get back on track. But I think Smith would play a big prt in tht. He says he grew up watching & admiring Smith & idet HE would say he's the better wr.

 

 

youre doing it wrong, youre suppose to close your mind and poo all over the question. i felt as another poster, smitty for this year but future nicks.......but after a few days, future is now. the smitty love is too much for some to consider nicks.

 

 

o fraud batman, troll on bub, troll on.

[NFLFangirl19]

youre doing it wrong, youre suppose to close your mind and poo all over the question. i felt as another poster, smitty for this year but future nicks.......but after a few days, future is now. the smitty love is too much for some to consider nicks.

o fraud batman, troll on bub, troll on.

most of this post didn't even make sense to me but the prt I did make out & actually agreed w/ was the prt tht said "Smitty for now & Hakeem for the future". That is 100% what I think the plan should be. Hakeem comes & plays along side him for a yr & then takes over for the future. But I have no reason to believe nicks is ready to be #1 RIGHT AWAY.

[MV%doe]

most of this post didn't even make sense to me but the prt I did make out & actually agreed w/ was the prt tht said "Smitty for now & Hakeem for the future". That is 100% what I think the plan should be. Hakeem comes & plays along side him for a yr & then takes over for the future. But I have no reason to believe nicks is ready to be #1 RIGHT AWAY.

 

 

i presuppose a question and got a huddle welcome, hence they poo on the question during the first 20 some posting. fraud batman is try-hard troll.  its a tough question, smitty or a younger #1/2 like WR? in a sense its not, the answer is almost always younger, but nicks didnt catch that x clown against st louis in 2003 etc etc.