Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers to get new starting DT in 2010?


ncbobcat

Recommended Posts

According to this article, defensive tackle is loaded next draft and if our interior guys get gashed...again, I think we select no fewer than TWO DTs next draft and possibly get a veteran if the Peppers salary is off-loaded. Somehow, some way, I think we get back into the first round to get one of these guys. Lord knows we need some help.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d81189d20&template=without-video-with-comments&confirm=true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking we do something to get back into the late first round picking up a DT and again in rounds 3 or 4. I'm not sure about a QB unless HurFox is ousted. They had rather pick up a backup already in the league than to groom them straight out of college. Jake's getting older, so maybe they'll change their mode of operation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its too early to tell were we will go with our first pick..plus i see this every year all these so called experts come out and say a certain class is deep..then some injurys happen.players suck.and all of a sudden..its a weak class..lol

plus they have The Golden Calf of Bristol as the #1 senior QB..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loaded at QB too. I'm thinking DT in the 2nd, QB in the 3rd.

:iagree: Not sure if we're load there, but another SLB to eventually replace Diggs wouldn't hurt, either. But, yeah, I would say DT and QB will be our biggest needs and what we should look for in the 2010 draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our interior only really got "gashed" when Lewis or Kemo were on the bench, that having been said I do still think DT is our biggest single need.

True, however, their production faltered down the stretch. One can argue that if they are rotated out more frequently then those two will be just fine. While that may be the case, just okay is not what we need. I said this more than once, while Jenx was an immature prick, he was the glue for the DL...not Peppers. Kris was the one that gave DCs headaches moreso than Peppers and the combination of the two was devistating.

We need a stud in the middle and currently we have two servicable guys. If a player is commanding a double team in the middle, then one of the two ends are going to be one-on-one with a TE or RB. I like those odds. Right now, neither Kemo nor Lewis demands that kind of attention on a consistent basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we sorely miss Jenkins' talent, we have to have someone who can collapse the pocket from the middle AND hold up against the run. We had that in Jenkins, but things didn't work out for a variety of reasons. I really like Kemo, but wouldn't mind seeing a legit, beast DT come in and possibly make one of the nastiest DL's in the league. Hopefully with Lucas' release we'll see better coverage and give the front four more time to do their thing. Having a legit DL coach should also prove beneficial. I think the additions to the D staff will be big this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay...where is Gerald McCoy on this list? Pretty big oversite on their part. Granger is always injured and he's on this list, but McCoy would've probably been the first DT taken this year and he's nowhere to be found.

Allen Bailey or Marvin Austin foregoing their senior season would make the position even stronger. Suh is a top-three pick. Arhur Jones would look good as a Panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • keaton is a former Catamount.  The list I saw had only 2--Sanker and Emmanwori.  But I do recall hearing about Bowman. The theory that we are looking for specific hybrid safeties is upheld by this.  Keaton fits the "type" who can play zone or deep and in the box.  "He's a physical player with a high motor and a nose for the football. He has a good understanding of zone coverage and can play in the box as a force defender. Keaton is a leader and has earned a single-digit jersey number at Temple, a tradition reserved for team leaders." At WCU, he averaged 6.5 tackles per game, leading the team before transferring. Sanker has special teams abilities and a high football IQ.  He can cover TEs and RBs and keeps the play in front.  He would be a nice fit as a depth player.  I did not know they met with Bowman at the SR bowl.  He is more of a free safety who struggles in tackling/run support, but that is not to say he is not versatile within his capabilities. Stark is a SS who is a brutal hitter, but I don't see his hybrid qualities--they met with him at the Combine when everyone was in the building, but that was nearly 2 months ago and I don't think there has been contact since. Emmanwori is who they would love to have in my opinion.  NFL Draft Buzz:  "His ability to play in the box, handle man coverage responsibilities, and deliver bone-crushing hits makes him an ideal fit for defenses that ask their safeties to wear multiple hats." So it seems they are looking for a type.  The Keaton pick is intriguing to me because he is a sleeper who would clearly be there in round 5 or later.  They seem attracted to his characteristics, and he is a thumper who can play deep.  To me, the fact that they want 2 hybrid safeties of a certain type is rather obvious.  Maybe I am forcing a round peg into a square hole, but I love trying to see what skillsets teams value to guess draft picks.
    • Because it’s all bullshit and they know it’s bullshit. 
    • I'm hoping the Jets draft Warren over an OT, that way he won't be on the board WHEN (not if) we bypass him for a less polished player.  BPA my arse.  I know, I know, he might not be that high on our board, even though roughly 95% of all Big Boards I've seen has him at least a top 8 talent.  VERY seldomly to I see him ranked lower than that.  Granted he's slated to get drafted lower than that value simply because TE is a niche positional need.  Again, Sanders is not a TE1, he's a TE2.  I mean, we tried to make Ian Thomas a TE1 for how long?  Thomas was at best a TE3, but we kept trying.
×
×
  • Create New...