Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Largest solar power plant in world goes online...


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

I've been trying to sell solar engineers and contractors on our industry for about 5 years now. There are millions of square feet of unused warehouse rooftops that could be used to house solar panels. So far the ROI still seems to be too long to justify some of the projects I've been researching unless the facility owner is some gung-ho environmentalist. Some of the bigger property management firms are finally utilizing their rooftops as solar fields in some areas. In some cases the facility can be taken almost entirely off the grid, in others they are simply selling the power generated back to the local energy co-op. But ROI is still around 15-20 years I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been trying to sell solar engineers and contractors on our industry for about 5 years now. There are millions of square feet of unused warehouse rooftops that could be used to house solar panels. So far the ROI still seems to be too long to justify some of the projects I've been researching unless the facility owner is some gung-ho environmentalist. Some of the bigger property management firms are finally utilizing their rooftops as solar fields in some areas. In some cases the facility can be taken almost entirely off the grid, in others they are simply selling the power generated back to the local energy co-op. But ROI is still around 15-20 years I believe.

They need to figure out a way to make the return a bit more immediate. Maybe incentive the workers that if they chip in they get x tax credit along with the company. You get real time return but the long term is easier funding the sinking costs.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been trying to sell solar engineers and contractors on our industry for about 5 years now. There are millions of square feet of unused warehouse rooftops that could be used to house solar panels. So far the ROI still seems to be too long to justify some of the projects I've been researching unless the facility owner is some gung-ho environmentalist. Some of the bigger property management firms are finally utilizing their rooftops as solar fields in some areas. In some cases the facility can be taken almost entirely off the grid, in others they are simply selling the power generated back to the local energy co-op. But ROI is still around 15-20 years I believe.

At the commercial or utility level, ROI is easily achievable in less than 10 years, especially in NC. When I worked for a solar company in Maryland, our commercial clients usually had ROI's of 5-8 years...and solar costs have dropped nearly 60% since I worked in that industry just 3 years ago. Incentives in most areas have also decreased, so the ROI for the system owners have remained similar. Homeowners will always have longer ROI's because of economies of scale.

 

The plant like the one pictures above cannot be compared to a regular solar system though. I don't really know much about their ROI's, but the technology is way different.

 

That entire array simply concentrates the sun's rays to boil water, producing steam, which creates electricity. Molten salts are used to store the sun's heat so the system can continue producing power at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to figure out a way to make the return a bit more immediate. Maybe incentive the workers that if they chip in they get x tax credit along with the company. You get real time return but the long term is easier funding the sinking costs.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

There are lot's of funding sources out there now that will allow businesses to be net income positive from day 1.

 

Solar farms / systems are relatively attractive to long term investors that are looking for a consistent and predictable investment. We have decades of data that give us a reliable average for number of sunny days and you can easily calculate the system's production from that data. Some assumptions are made on the price of electricity, but whether you take best case (electricity prices stay where they are) or worst case (they increase significantly) the returns are still relatively attractive for someone that wants a "safe" investment.

 

Investing in solar technologies is decidedly less safe, but the systems in operation are pretty safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are lot's of funding sources out there now that will allow businesses to be net income positive from day 1.

 

Solar farms / systems are relatively attractive to long term investors that are looking for a consistent and predictable investment. We have decades of data that give us a reliable average for number of sunny days and you can easily calculate the system's production from that data. Some assumptions are made on the price of electricity, but whether you take best case (electricity prices stay where they are) or worst case (they increase significantly) the returns are still relatively attractive for someone that wants a "safe" investment.

 

Investing in solar technologies is decidedly less safe, but the systems in operation are pretty safe.

 

Totally agree.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...