Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One last look back at last season....

jc3588

By jc3588,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jc3588 Newbie

jc3588

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Wait...what?

Seattle has an NFL team?

When did this happen?

Apparently they got the team in 1995, two years after we did... took us 10 years to make it to the Super Bowl, and it must have taken them the same amount of time, right?

No? They really suck THAT much? Damn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
Posted

Apparently they got the team in 1995, two years after we did... took us 10 years to make it to the Super Bowl, and it must have taken them the same amount of time, right?

No? They really suck THAT much? Damn.

Congratulations you established loosing the superbowl before we did:beerchug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jc3588 Newbie

jc3588

Posted
  • Author
Posted

1. We got there first. 10 years versus your (what was it?) 35?

2. We only lost by 3, on a last second FG. You lost by 11. At least people were still watching our game right up to the very end.

3. Thanks for admitting that historically the Seahawks have sucked WAY more than the Panthers ever did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
Posted

1. We got there first. 10 years versus your (what was it?) 35?

2. We only lost by 3, on a last second FG. You lost by 11. At least people were still watching our game right up to the very end.

3. Thanks for admitting that historically the Seahawks have sucked WAY more than the Panthers ever did.

1.Yes you are First looser CONGRATULATIONS:beerchug:

2.Your wron "AGAIN" SB XL had the highest TV rankings in SB history -----as much as yuou hate your team wasnt their everyone in the world was still watching.

3.We have been to more playoff games in our franchise history than you have.

:owned:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jc3588 Newbie

jc3588

Posted
  • Author
Posted

1. Thanks for admitting the Squawks sucked for a very long time.

2. Wrong. The 1982 Super Bowl between San Francisco and Cincinnati had a 49.1 rating. This SB had a 41.6 rating. (I checked.) Do your homework before you post about stuff you know little or nothing about.

3. Gee, since your franchise is only 3 times older than ours, I'd hope so. Since this was your first trip to the SB, it just confirms that you all are a bunch of chokers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
Posted

1. Thanks for admitting the Squawks sucked for a very long time.

2. Wrong. The 1982 Super Bowl between San Francisco and Cincinnati had a 49.1 rating. This SB had a 41.6 rating. (I checked.) Do your homework before you post about stuff you know little or nothing about.

3. Gee, since your franchise is only 3 times older than ours, I'd hope so. Since this was your first trip to the SB, it just confirms that you all are a bunch of chokers.

OMG do you live in a hole in the ground it was all over ESPN and NFL network it was the most watched televised show only 2nd to the last showing of MASH in 1982.:swordfigh

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jc3588 Newbie

jc3588

Posted
  • Author
Posted

OMG do you live in a hole in the ground it was all over ESPN and NFL network it was the most watched televised show only 2nd to the last showing of MASH in 1982.:swordfigh
No, I don't live in a hole in the ground... I know that it was second in number of viewers only to the M*A*S*H finale.

But that's not what you said. You said, and I quote, "Your wron "AGAIN" SB XL had the highest TV rankings in SB history." And that is patently WRONG, as I very clearly demonstrated. Ratings/rankings does NOT equal number of viewers.

Maybe you should pay more attention to what you say than how you say it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Megax Newbie

Megax

Posted
Posted

No, I don't live in a hole in the ground... I know that it was second in number of viewers only to the M*A*S*H finale.

But that's not what you said. You said, and I quote, "Your wron "AGAIN" SB XL had the highest TV rankings in SB history." And that is patently WRONG, as I very clearly demonstrated. Ratings/rankings does NOT equal number of viewers.

Maybe you should pay more attention to what you say than how you say it.

We should all give up on this idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
Posted

No, I don't live in a hole in the ground... I know that it was second in number of viewers only to the M*A*S*H finale.

But that's not what you said. You said, and I quote, "Your wron "AGAIN" SB XL had the highest TV rankings in SB history." And that is patently WRONG, as I very clearly demonstrated. Ratings/rankings does NOT equal number of viewers.

Maybe you should pay more attention to what you say than how you say it.

Oh okay I forgot I was talking to a lawyer........we have to be politically correct up in this joint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jc3588 Newbie

jc3588

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Oh okay I forgot I was talking to a lawyer........we have to be politically correct up in this joint.
Erm, I'm not a lawyer.

If you say stupid things and people call you on it, it makes you look even more stupid if you proceed to get all uppity about it. If you want it to stop, stop saying stupid things. I don't read what you MEANT to say... I read what you DID say. Until you learn how to say what you mean, be prepared for more people to think you're stupid.

And being PC is about the last thing on my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrka1979 Newbie

mrka1979

Posted
Posted

Erm, I'm not a lawyer.

If you say stupid things and people call you on it, it makes you look even more stupid if you proceed to get all uppity about it. If you want it to stop, stop saying stupid things. I don't read what you MEANT to say... I read what you DID say. Until you learn how to say what you mean, be prepared for more people to think you're stupid.

And being PC is about the last thing on my mind.

well said LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...