Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical: if Clowney falls to Atlanta


Ruff

Recommended Posts

I don't think so, we really shouldn't reach to build our team based on what others are doing to build theirs.

ETA: Having said that, if BPA at 28 is an OT/OG then yeah we should pick them regardless.

No to OG in the first. Especially when we have about 5 coming back from injury. Would be stupid. Especially with the needs we have. Always go BPA at positions of need

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, we need OT regardless at some point. If we get a 2nd and 4th for Hardy, we could use one of our two 2nds on Tiny Richardson, who held his own quite well against Clowney while at UT. I don't want in the 1st but with two 2nds it'd be very enticing. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No to OG in the first. Especially when we have about 5 coming back from injury. Would be stupid. Especially with the needs we have. Always go BPA at positions of need

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubtful there's an elite OT available at #28. If there is, of course we should consider him. It'd be crazy of us not to considering our roster. Most everyone agrees that our biggest needs are WR, OT, and CB. If an elite player is available at the bottom of the 1st when you're on the clock, you'd be crazy NKT to seriously consider him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clowney will not fall that far. I'm sure we will end up with a good tackle anyways. This draft is loaded with great ones. It's one of our biggest needs and gettleman knows that. He will get us one. Not worried one tiny bit

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

It's actually not that far/out of the question. Atlanta is selecting 6 th, with QB needy teams selecting before them. Couple that with elite players like Greg Robinson and Jake Matthews, it's very possible Clowney is there at 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...