Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical: if Clowney falls to Atlanta


Ruff

Recommended Posts

I don't think so, we really shouldn't reach to build our team based on what others are doing to build theirs.

ETA: Having said that, if BPA at 28 is an OT/OG then yeah we should pick them regardless.

No to OG in the first. Especially when we have about 5 coming back from injury. Would be stupid. Especially with the needs we have. Always go BPA at positions of need

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, we need OT regardless at some point. If we get a 2nd and 4th for Hardy, we could use one of our two 2nds on Tiny Richardson, who held his own quite well against Clowney while at UT. I don't want in the 1st but with two 2nds it'd be very enticing. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No to OG in the first. Especially when we have about 5 coming back from injury. Would be stupid. Especially with the needs we have. Always go BPA at positions of need

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubtful there's an elite OT available at #28. If there is, of course we should consider him. It'd be crazy of us not to considering our roster. Most everyone agrees that our biggest needs are WR, OT, and CB. If an elite player is available at the bottom of the 1st when you're on the clock, you'd be crazy NKT to seriously consider him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clowney will not fall that far. I'm sure we will end up with a good tackle anyways. This draft is loaded with great ones. It's one of our biggest needs and gettleman knows that. He will get us one. Not worried one tiny bit

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

It's actually not that far/out of the question. Atlanta is selecting 6 th, with QB needy teams selecting before them. Couple that with elite players like Greg Robinson and Jake Matthews, it's very possible Clowney is there at 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...