Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cats @ Lakers


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Guest Dark Knight

Just tuned in...

McRoberts loafs around under the goal flat-footed & gives up an offensive rebound, rolls to the opposite baseline in time to foul Gasol, then comes back the other way & jacks up a brick from 3.

PUT ZELLER IN THE GAME YOU BALD OAF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just stop now!!

A week ago we lost to the Knicks.

We are not a better team without our 2nd best scorer and floor leader.

 

I'm not trying to bash you but you really need to work on strengthening your arguments...

 

You also failed to mention that Carmelo Anthony went for 62 while shooting 66% from the field (that is unheard of).

 

You also failed to mention that a few weeks before we lost to the Knicks, the Knicks also beat the Heat.

 

I'm not saying that the Knicks are good, but they have a superstar in Carmelo Anthony and some solid talent around him. It seems like a coaching issue along with a character issue regarding some of the players, not a talent issue.

 

As far as the Cats being better without Kemba... at times we are better without Kemba. Sessions doesn't take near as many shots as Walker meaning that Al (who shoots 73% at the rim) can go to work down low without having to watch Kemba go 3-17 and taking touches away from him (Jefferson).

 

There's pro's and con's to Kemba's game (and personally I think we are better with him), but don't bash the man for his opinion without actual facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to bash you but you really need to work on strengthening your arguments...

 

You also failed to mention that Carmelo Anthony went for 62 while shooting 66% from the field (that is unheard of).

 

You also failed to mention that a few weeks before we lost to the Knicks, the Knicks also beat the Heat.

 

I'm not saying that the Knicks are good, but they have a superstar in Carmelo Anthony and some solid talent around him. It seems like a coaching issue along with a character issue regarding some of the players, not a talent issue.

 

As far as the Cats being better without Kemba... at times we are better without Kemba. Sessions doesn't take near as many shots as Walker meaning that Al (who shoots 73% at the rim) can go to work down low without having to watch Kemba go 3-17 and taking touches away from him (Jefferson).

 

There's pro's and con's to Kemba's game (and personally I think we are better with him), but don't bash the man for his opinion without actual facts.

 

 

I'm sorry i didn't make it clear for you but I was pointing to more of the fact that this statement was made after the 2 game winning streak after Kemba was hurt. Then we lost 2 in a row and no comment.

 

Is this going to be the new thing?? We win a few without Kemba and the haters come out. Then we lose a few and they are no where to be found.

 

Also I would like to point out that while Kemba may take more shots then Session he also demands more attention which helps other around him.  And Al's effectiveness now has nothing to do with Kemba being out. He is healthy (ankle injury) and is in NBA shape which he wasn't most of the season with Kemba .

 

Kemba is also a better defender then Session. He gets us at least 5 easy basket a night on fast breaks more then Session. 

 

So Again we are not a better team without Kemba. I said nothing wrong here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fair enough. I never once said not supporting Tepper makes you a bad fan by the way. I can't stand the guy myself. You on the other hand don't like anything about the team. You can't stand the owner or the coach because his religion doesn't fall in line with how you feel it should so I'm curious why you are even a fan at this point? Hell, you like nothing about the team, why even be a fan these days?  We can go backs and forth about how many games we have been to and measure dicks if you want or but it doesn't matter. I've been to my fair share over the years. Some as a fan and some work related but I bet you have been to more due to my weekends being filled with some work I do at the collegiate level so I probably only average maybe 2-3 games per year tops. You have me beat there im sure. You are probably very correct on us not being the same in anything at all I am quite sure of that. If I'm a "mark" (as you put it) for not liking Tepper and not caring about Canales religion or his political beliefs or letting it have weight on whether or not I like the team then call me a "mark" but you're still a whiny bitch either way.  When you hate everything about leadership from their personalities to their religious beliefs all the way to who they vote for at that point why even be a fan? I can side with you judging by your beliefs that you have made apparent, if you owned and coached the team, I sure as hell would find a new one to support but as you said we are different. Enjoy Norway, it is a beautiful country. Visited last year myself and absolutely loved it.
    • The playing well part, depends on what happens going forward. It could have been a tease that will dig our hole deeper.  In the small picture of one game, probably his best game. Green Bay wasn't as great as people think it was. More like one good quarter. Followed by two games of exactly nothing. 
    • Oh, it was handled horrifically.  Ego got in the way of a plan.  I'm just saying, that he actually probably stumbled into the better outcome/plan.  
×
×
  • Create New...