Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An Elephant in the Room


twylyght

Recommended Posts

I am absolutely shocked that it has been brought up as little as it has, but I figure I might as well mention it.

The schedule. Is anyone paying attention? When I look at this schedule, I do not see a single off-week in terms of opponents. Moreover, with a bye week so early in the season and concerns with depth at OLine and DLine, it HAS to figure in to how our season will play out.

Last year, we had a favorable schedule with a table of relatively weak opponents across the board. Couple that with outstanding depth where we needed it, we matched our best regular season win total in franchise history.

When I look at this year's schedule, I think I will be happy with a 9-7 outcome and getting into the playoffs ahead of the rest of the NFC South.

Am I crazy? Please... someone talk me down from this, because I don't honestly don't see the amazing season that so many people here are talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never really buy in to the preseason tough schedule talk. Some of the teams we think are good on that schedule will tank this year, other teams we think are bad will do better.

The preseason schedule rankings are never accurate come the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the schedule is tough. but this team always seems to play better against tougher competition. playing a tougher schedule will also make this team more prepared for the playoffs, just look at the steelers last year. so im not too worried.

Exactly. The schedule may or may not be as tough as it seems. Assuming it is as tough as it appears, it can only make the Panthers are stronger team because of it. Of course, the rest of the NFC South has to play a pretty tough schedule as well.

I'm hoping for 10-6 and winning the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly Zod, who knows who is going to be good or not this season.....I think that our opponents are going to be tough, but we are going to be tough too, so its not an off week for any of our opponents either. Well, unless Jake goes down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am waiting for the time when teams see us on the schedule and are afraid instead of the other way around. For what it is worth we need to be able to compete with the NFC and AFC east teams. Otherwise we don't need to be talked about in the same breath with top teams. Secondly we haven't been less than 7-9 under Fox no matter what the issues. And when Jake has been healthy for all 16 games, with the exception of 2004 when everyone else was hurt, we have never failed to win at least 11 games. I have us pegged to win 10 games this year which I believe is doable if we can stay healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am waiting for the time when teams see us on the schedule and are afraid instead of the other way around. For what it is worth we need to be able to compete with the NFC and AFC east teams. Otherwise we don't need to be talked about in the same breath with top teams. Secondly we haven't been less than 7-9 under Fox no matter what the issues. And when Jake has been healthy for all 16 games, with the exception of 2004 when everyone else was hurt, we have never failed to win at least 11 games. I have up pegged to win 10 games this year which I believe is doable if we can stay healthy.

That's what I'm talkin' about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say the elephant is the horrible offensive play calling in the last game. WTF was up with that?

It was Davidson's first time in the playoffs. Hopefully he learned something from it and calls a better game next time. Experience isn't the easiest teacher but sometimes it is the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...