Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 Huddle mock offseason trading thread

DaCityKats

By DaCityKats,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Munch4455 Newbie

Munch4455

Posted
Posted

hes injury prone and had one great year

 

Someone should do some research before posting.

 

2010----Total Yards: 2220  TD:  18

2011----Total Yards: 1841  TD:  12 (13 Games Played)

2012----Total Yards: 1641  TD:  17

2013----Total Yards: 725    TD:  2   (8 Games Played)

 

3 Really good years followed by one year he has a nagging injury and still was on pace to have almost 1500 total yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MichaelNewtonII Contributor

MichaelNewtonII

Posted
Posted

Someone should do some research before posting.

2010----Total Yards: 2220 TD: 18

2011----Total Yards: 1841 TD: 12 (13 Games Played)

2012----Total Yards: 1641 TD: 17

2013----Total Yards: 725 TD: 2 (8 Games Played)

3 Really good years followed by one year he has a nagging injury and still was on pace to have almost 1500 total yards.

I said great year, not "really good" and its not ur decision who I trade its mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Munch4455 Newbie

Munch4455

Posted
Posted

I said great year, not "really good" and its not ur decision who I trade its mine.

1800+ yards and 12 TD's in 13 games, and 1600+ yards and 17 TD's don't constitute great seasons?  Thank goodness you aren't a real GM, you would probably try and get rid of AP in his prime.

 

And its the rules that state that you cannot trade core players unless there is a very good reason.  With Ben Tate a free agent, and likely a new QB going to be starting next year, I would typically classify a guy, who is almost guaranteed to go over 1000 yards on the ground and add another few hundred through the air, would be considered a core guy.

 

If you want to take the only consistant threat you have on your offense(other than an aging Andre Johnson) and trade him away thats your deal, but the rules say no trading core players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

This is what I don't get... They already barely utilize their very good running back in Murray, why would they bring in another guy to steal his carries

While its not necessary to defend any moves made or not made. In this "mock" offseason it would seem the aquisition of talent is the key. Murray and Foster both have injury concerns. The Cowboys are documented as having RB as a need going into the offseason. With both guys splitting carries it would stand to reason that with a tandom it could reduce injury risk while maintaining interchangable RBs. Foster is a good pass catcher and a game changer when healthy. Why not have more playmakers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MichaelNewtonII Contributor

MichaelNewtonII

Posted
Posted

1800+ yards and 12 TD's in 13 games, and 1600+ yards and 17 TD's don't constitute great seasons?  Thank goodness you aren't a real GM, you would probably try and get rid of AP in his prime.

 

And its the rules that state that you cannot trade core players unless there is a very good reason.  With Ben Tate a free agent, and likely a new QB going to be starting next year, I would typically classify a guy, who is almost guaranteed to go over 1000 yards on the ground and add another few hundred through the air, would be considered a core guy.

 

If you want to take the only consistant threat you have on your offense(other than an aging Andre Johnson) and trade him away thats your deal, but the rules say no trading core players.

i don't like injury prone guys why don't u worry about urself and let me run my team u have no idea what i have planned so just wait nd see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...