Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Commish may do away with extra point


Zod

Recommended Posts

Honestly I have no problem with removing the extra point. Get 7 pts for td or go for 2 pt conversion and if you fail you get 6 pts. 

 

Guys this simply just makes sense. How many peeps would actually miss the extra point kick. It is so pointless. 

 

Nothing wrong with progression of a game. This is why MLB doesn't have replay - does it make sense to have replays for important plays? yes it does but why not change it? Because peeps dont want to change...

 

Honestly if you look at the history of our time we freaking went from slavery, racial equality, woman rights, gay rights in 150 yrs. Why change? Cause it makes sense and will make the future better.

 

This change will make the game better because it makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been talking about it since last season. Says it kills drama after a late score and adds to potential injuries

 

Week 2 in the 03-04 season the Bucs hit the touchdown on the late drive.  Extra point wins it for them, but we blocked it and won in over time.  It didn't kill the drama.  Best Panther game I've ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the problem is that they are too automatic...

Kick it from the "X" marked where the ball is spotted after a touchback.

Or, if from further, from where the ball was last snapped. Imagine kicking a PAT from the 9 after LaFell's 91 yard TD a few years ago.

Same thing with 2 point conversions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Week 2 in the 03-04 season the Bucs hit the touchdown on the late drive. Extra point wins it for them, but we blocked it and won in over time. It didn't kill the drama. Best Panther game I've ever seen.

Us panther fans will always have that memory. However, Im pretty sure thats the only time in NFL history that a blocked extra point at the end of regulation caused OT or the other team to win. So im not sure 1 time in 1,000's of attempts means much. Also, i agree with you, i dont want it changed. Just saying, im not part of the committee that is voting on this. So I just expect the worst and was just stating what Ive heard/read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is amazing. The play is too pointless in the NFL, and it's boring as poo to watch.

 

Dallas would agree with you.    They lost a critical game against the Seahawks a couple years ago because the botched the extra point. 

 

LEAVE IT ALONE.  If you drop the extra point you also have to drop the two point conversion.  Maybe we should do away with the safety too.   Fug it.  Drop the Touchdown and we can play for fun and nobody loses.

 

Wanna make a interesting put the extra point a 40 yds instead of a chip shot.   Going for two at the 5 instead of the 2.  That would be more challenging then getting rid of it all together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Goodell is a great commish by any means but for those that think he is the reason the league is getting watered down you may want to brush up on your league rules history. Here are some rules that were implemented long before Goodell that he somehow is blamed for in peoples mind. Every sport evolves, if you are not progressing then there is trouble down the road.

 

Without looking it up, guess what year's these rules were put into place:

 

 - Rule changes were adopted to open up the passing game and to cut down on injuries.

 

-  Defenders were permitted to make contact with eligible receivers only once; the head slap was outlawed; offensive linemen were prohibited from thrusting their hands to an opponent's neck, face, or head; and wide receivers were prohibited from clipping, even in the legal clipping zone.

 

-  The NFL continued a trend toward opening up the game. Rules changes permitted a defender to maintain contact with a receiver within five yards of the line of scrimmage, but restricted contact beyond that point.

 

 - NFL rules changes emphasized additional player safety. The changes prohibited players on the receiving team from blocking below the waist during kickoffs, punts, and field-goal attempts; prohibited the wearing of torn or altered equipment and exposed pads that could be hazardous; extended the zone in which there could be no crackback blocks; and instructed officials to quickly whistle a play dead when a quarterback was clearly in the grasp of a tackler.

 

 - Rules changes placed greater restrictions on contact in the area of the head, neck, and face.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All were approved in the 1970's. I think if you look through this timeline, the NFL and it's rule changes are no different then they have ever been. It really is interesting to see when some of the rules specifically for player safety and to open up the offense and make things more exciting started . This entire list is pre Goodell.

 

 

http://www.sportsattic.com/araig/NflRulesHistory.htm 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is.  I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him.  So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too.  Which is just going to happen. 
    • Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards.
    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
×
×
  • Create New...