Giants letting Nicks walk!

[TheRed]

I see that you are just making friends every where you go .

Damn you are definitely an obnoxious little poo.

You have absolutely no room whatsoever to talk. I mean none.

I don't recall ever telling anyone on here that their parents should have aborted them. I'm guessing you don't say that to people you meet at tailgates.

[Icebox]

Red, do you really dispute how rare it is for a rookie WR to have an immediate impact? That was the point, after all. Or do you really think that by finding one omission out of 15+ years that you've won some sort of gold star? Does that one really blunt the argument that it is very rare for a rookie WR to have an immediate impact? And what do you have to say about the fact that you couldn't read well enough to see that we were limiting our scope to *first round* picks (like you are suggesting we burn on WR)?

 

And (since I know exactly how youre going to respond) before you try to argue that I've said something that I haven't said, I'm not disputing the need to draft WRs. The only think I'm disputing is the contention made in this thread that we should fix WR just through the draft.

 

I bet "Red" has lots of friends in real life with that repulsive personality. No wonder he has so many damn posts. We're the only people who will talk to him. Is this guy really a moderator? WTH

[TheRumGone]

You don't double dip on one position when you have 5 damn picks. That's the reason why we fell on offense further than we rose on defense.

Injuries played a role, setting us up for the future played a role. Luke kuechly absolutely dominating played a role in last years 10th ranked defense.

I know we go back and forth and disagree about what should have been done but you cannot with complete certainty say that drafting Keenan Allen instead of kk would put us over the top and in the Super Bowl. I know you are smarter than that.

The dt position was similar to the wr position last year. We had virtually no nose tackle and a 32 year old 3 tech. We just completely changed that in one offseason. I've always said when we double dipped dts it was because gentleman realized this was the best short term and long term answer for getting this team where It needs to be headed. Gentleman also realized like many of us that Cam masks offensive deficiencies. We draft Keenan we still need more Wrs. We draft kk we are set defensively for 4 plus years. We completed the defense. It is offenses time now. Offense came last because that is how special Cam is. Is it unfair? Absolutely but that's what shitty draft choices and a gm who has no idea how to manage the team put us in. This past draft was the quickest way to short term and long term success. I believe that to my core.

[AceBoogie]

Injuries played a role, setting us up for the future played a role. Luke kuechly absolutely dominating played a role in last years 10th ranked defense.

I know we go back and forth and disagree about what should have been done but you cannot with complete certainty say that drafting Keenan Allen instead of kk would put us over the top and in the Super Bowl. I know you are smarter than that.

The dt position was similar to the wr position last year. We had virtually no nose tackle and a 32 year old 3 tech. We just completely changed that in one offseason. I've always said when we double dipped dts it was because gentleman realized this was the best short term and long term answer for getting this team where It needs to be headed. Gentleman also realized like many of us that Cam masks offensive deficiencies. We draft Keenan we still need more Wrs. We draft kk we are set defensively for 4 plus years. We completed the defense. It is offenses time now. Offense came last because that is how special Cam is. Is it unfair? Absolutely but that's what shitty draft choices and a gm who has no idea how to manage the team put us in. This past draft was the quickest way to short term and long term success. I believe that to my core.

I respect your opinion, and I understand where you coming from. If I had the picks I would have done it differently, but that's just me. As bad as we need a WR I still don't believe we should double dip. As long as Gettleman shows that putting talent around Cam is priority #1 I'll be happy.

You can say injuries played a roll, but I don't think anyone other than Amini would have made much of an impact. The talent simply isn't there on offense. I don't like when a GM publicly states that his quarterback needs to start winning, but goes heavy defense.

I've never seen a team draft a quarterback #1 overall and fail to surround him with weapons for going on four years. It blows my mind. All of that isn't on Gettleman, and most of you are giving him a pass this year. But the excuses are gone. You have the #2 defense now.

Is Gettleman the answer at GM? 1..2..3...4...5..6...7.....yes, but now it's time to start putting some weapons around Cam Newton.

[TheRumGone]

I respect your opinion, and I understand where you coming from. If I had the picks I would have done it differently, but that's just me. As bad as we need a WR I still don't believe we should double dip. As long as Gettleman shows that putting talent around Cam is priority #1 I'll be happy.

You can say injuries played a roll, but I don't think anyone other than Amini would have made much of an impact. The talent simply isn't there on offense. I don't like when a GM publicly states that his quarterback needs to start winning, but goes heavy defense.

I've never seen a team draft a quarterback #1 overall and fail to surround him with weapons for going on four years. It blows my mind. All of that isn't on Gettleman, and most of you are giving him a pass this year. But the excuses are gone. You have the #2 defense now.

Is Gettleman the answer at GM? 1..2..3...4...5..6...7.....yes, but now it's time to start putting some weapons around Cam Newton.

No doubt. You know I said after last years draft that this is the year we start drafting for Cam. We lacked talent in many different places when cam got here. It's his turn now.

[MtnProwler]

Who needs the whiners to come in here, we beat each other up enough to implode this whole forum.

Look we are 5 good resigns, 2 FA players, and only a "decent" draft to be competing for the NFC South again. A feat we have never done before.

Now smile and enjoy the ride!

[Jangler]

 

[N0 LyF3 ScRuB]

Nicks is a solid #2... but I'd rather draft someone like Evans that has the potential to be a #1

[RoaringRiot]

Nicks is a solid #2... but I'd rather draft someone like Evans that has the potential to be a #1

Why does it have to be one or the other?

[N0 LyF3 ScRuB]

Why does it have to be one or the other?

 

Because we need a fast receiver at the #3 (slot) and Ginn (even Hixon) fill that roll great. We don't need Nicks if we get a receiver round 1.

[RoaringRiot]

Because we need a fast receiver at the #3 (slot) and Ginn (even Hixon) fill that roll great. We don't need Nicks if we get a receiver round 1.

With the type of production a rookie WR typically has we would actually be the same if not worse off than just keeping LaFell. And that's assuming we hit on a WR that will do well. A good vet, whether or not it's Nicks, is needed

[N0 LyF3 ScRuB]

With the type of production a rookie WR typically has we would actually be the same if not worse off than just keeping LaFell. And that's assuming we hit on a WR that will do well. A good vet, whether or not it's Nicks, is needed

 

It depends man. There's enough WR talent in this draft where certain receivers can definitely make an immediate impact.

[RoaringRiot]

It depends man. There's enough WR talent in this draft where certain receivers can definitely make an immediate impact.

Read back a few pages. The rookie WRs who have had a significant immediate impact have been listed. There aren't many.

We absolutely need to draft a WR who can contribute and be the future. We need a vet to come in too. Otherwise I don't think we are really upgrading at all.

[CarolinaCoolin]

Oh so you didn't say that it's old news, and no one cares that he is a racist, and called a black man the n word? Do I need to go back and quote your posts?

You try your best to make yourself the victim, but you keep coming back and quoting me, and anyone who mentions me.

Did I say that it's old news in the context of him getting paid for on field production? Yes. I never said no one cares he's a racist or that he called a black man the n word. Ago ahead. Try to find those quotes cause they don't exist.

Everyone here knows you try to make up fake arguments. You aren't fooling anyone. 3 people in the same thread have called you out on it. Give it up