Live Press Conference with G-Man @ Noon

[teeray]

I'm not going to explain the entire thread, keep poking at posts trying to find some argument to win.

 

We have a poo offense, it's a fact. Why did I even bother lowering myself to your level, I knew this would happen, right back to the start.

 

That has been the only thing you have said the entire time.  "We have a poo offense.... because I say we do."

 

Compelling stuff man.  Sorry to bring you down to the level of advanced statistics and basic math.  Stay up at that level of not understanding football or the basic concepts of cause and effect.

[Guest shitposting]

Hey guys we ranked 11th in points per drive! Thats one stat where we are slightly better than mediocre!

 

Don't worry Zod we have TOP, and skewed efficiency on third down. Our offense is good for real.

[Guest shitposting]

That has been the only thing you have said the entire time.  "We have a poo offense.... because I say we do."

 

Compelling stuff man.  Sorry to bring you down to the level of advanced statistics and basic math.  Stay up at that level of not understanding football or the basic concepts of cause and effect.

 

You're so bad at this man. I've been the only one to bring in statistics, and disprove your retarded theory that having a high TOP and poo offense somehow is a winning formula that improves defense. Keep arguing against those straw mans big guy.

[teeray]

Hey guys we ranked 11th in points per drive! Thats one stat where we are slightly better than mediocre!

 

Actually 10th and 9th in TDs per drive.

 

we were also top 10 in

 

TOs per drive (7)

Drive Success rate (5)

plays per drive (3)

TOP per drive (2)

Red Zone efficiency (8)

And TD/FG ratio (10)

 

 

 

Yep all those ONE stats.  :D 

 

 

 

 

[GreatPoupon]

wth grrbeck go have a drink. 

[teeray]

You're so bad at this man. I've been the only one to bring in statistics, and disprove your retarded theory that having a high TOP and poo offense somehow is a winning formula that improves defense. Keep arguing against those straw mans big guy.

 

Sorry.  I will try to get better. 

 

And maybe you should learn what strawman arguments and circular logic is before you use those terms again.  It may help people take you more seriously

[GreatPoupon]

i might agree with mediocre on offense... but not terrible. a OL plug in with some extra weapons and OK can become great. 

[EightyNine]

What circle?  For someone who calls someone else retarded, or that has retarded questions, you can't even seem to comprehend math that my nephew in 4th grade in a pooty public school can comprehend.

 

Here is a math equation that may help.

 

player A shoots 200 Free throws

Player B shoots 100 free throws

Player A makes 180 free throws

player B makes 90 free throws

 

Who is the better free throw shooter?

 

A)  Player A because he made twice as many free throws

B )  Player B because he missed 10 less free throws

C) they are equally efficient free throw shooters

This isnt really a perfect example because if I follow this logic all the way through, you would be saying that someone who shoots 5 free throws all year and makes all 5 of them is better than someone who scored 40 out of 50.

[Guest shitposting]

Sorry.  I will try to get better. 

 

And maybe you should learn what strawman arguments and circular logic is before you use those terms again.  It may help people take you more seriously

 

It's "straw man", not "strawman". See how silly semantics are? How smart you are (not).

Also, I've decided to not acknowledge you as a user, let alone your retarded non-argument.

[Zod]

Actually 10th and 9th in TDs per drive.

 

we were also top 10 in

 

TOs per drive (7)

Drive Success rate (5)

plays per drive (3)

TOP per drive (2)

Red Zone efficiency (8)

And TD/FG ratio (10)

 

 

 

Yep all those ONE stats.  :D

 

LOL

 

When have you ever seen ANY of those stats discussed anywhere. I never have.

 

How bout this, Shula was once again badly out coached in the playoffs. See how easy that is? No digging in charts for days to find.

 

:)

[beastson]

you can't just minimize the 2TE set without telling me how you think it's ineffective.  Because the opposite is true.  And try explaining how it's a phase by how it's ineffective.   Pats would still be running it if one of their guys didn't murder someone.  

 

And our run game is whoever is in the backfield.  That's why having a good OL minimizes the RB position.  We have plenty of talent to carry the rock too.  2 may deal with injuries but one will be available.  Tolbert is perfectly fine back there too.  Barner will a good option down the road.  Doesn't really matter.

 

I'm not saying it's ineffective, I'm saying wr > te position. Pats have a system. They still experiencing the same success with NO TE. They don't have either one.They're once again the championship game

 

Ok you upgrade OL, teams stack the box like they've done all year, then what? We back to "receiver make sure if this pass hit your hands you catch it cause 95% of the time if you dont it'll turn into a pick". Im not saying don't upgrade our OL, but at the end of the day you can't have your QB be your biggest playmaker. He stay QB and get playmakers

[GreatPoupon]

never seen red zone efficiency discussed? dude.... c'mon. 

[GreatPoupon]

This isnt really a perfect example because if I follow this logic all the way through, you would be saying that someone who shoots 5 free throws all year and makes all 5 of them is better than someone who scored 40 out of 50.

sample size matters too. 

[Guest shitposting]

I should have ignored him to begin with. I could tell he was the type to argue in circles that would break down into straw man, and ad hominem.