Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In Depth Review of Why the Refs Sucked [Pics]


Gucci Mane

Recommended Posts

[sorry for the sideways pics, idk why it did that but fugg it, you can turn your heads/laptops]

i know its easy to blame the refs for any loss but this was strait up ridiculous.. they gift wrapped 6 points to the 9ers and were lucky our defense is good enough so that gift didnt turn into 14 points.

 

First penalty was a tipped ball that would have gone to vernon had boldin not tipped it, so mitchell had already committed to the hit.

Next was the head butting penalty that Capt got called on, but anquan didnt.

Next was the bullshit call on DFlo... its hard to see in the Pics but the ball was thrown pretty shittily and way inside, nothing he could do, i think it should have been nothing.

Finally, there was holding call on Blackburn, which if they called that then they definitely should have called it on Willis during the interception.

 

 

 

Also..  Shula needs to go. When brooks jumped the line, he ran the same got damn play [same pre-snap motions] and it was obvious as fug. Also when he was close to the goal line before that, he ran cam out under center, line that 6'5'' fugger up in the heavy pistol and let him get a running start to jump over the line.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Walker/Stewart>Mykel on EDGE for me I’d still like to add TMac.    The only two WRs we have contracted beyond this year are XL and Coker (ERFA). Moving forward with TMac and those two feels much better. 
    • The trade below a few years ago was so bad and in favor of the Ravens, tf was Arizona doing Cardinals receive: Marquise Brown and 3rd round pick  Ravens receive: 23rd overall pick 
    • keaton is a former Catamount.  The list I saw had only 2--Sanker and Emmanwori.  But I do recall hearing about Bowman. The theory that we are looking for specific hybrid safeties is upheld by this.  Keaton fits the "type" who can play zone or deep and in the box.  "He's a physical player with a high motor and a nose for the football. He has a good understanding of zone coverage and can play in the box as a force defender. Keaton is a leader and has earned a single-digit jersey number at Temple, a tradition reserved for team leaders." At WCU, he averaged 6.5 tackles per game, leading the team before transferring. Sanker has special teams abilities and a high football IQ.  He can cover TEs and RBs and keeps the play in front.  He would be a nice fit as a depth player.  I did not know they met with Bowman at the SR bowl.  He is more of a free safety who struggles in tackling/run support, but that is not to say he is not versatile within his capabilities. Stark is a SS who is a brutal hitter, but I don't see his hybrid qualities--they met with him at the Combine when everyone was in the building, but that was nearly 2 months ago and I don't think there has been contact since. Emmanwori is who they would love to have in my opinion.  NFL Draft Buzz:  "His ability to play in the box, handle man coverage responsibilities, and deliver bone-crushing hits makes him an ideal fit for defenses that ask their safeties to wear multiple hats." So it seems they are looking for a type.  The Keaton pick is intriguing to me because he is a sleeper who would clearly be there in round 5 or later.  They seem attracted to his characteristics, and he is a thumper who can play deep.  To me, the fact that they want 2 hybrid safeties of a certain type is rather obvious.  Maybe I am forcing a round peg into a square hole, but I love trying to see what skillsets teams value to guess draft picks.
×
×
  • Create New...