Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy contract and Johnson

Squirrel

By Squirrel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Squirrel Collaborator

Squirrel

Posted
Posted

I have always been a strong believer that you cant keep both after this year.  It would lock up to much cap space over the next couple of years.  But I did some research and I can see a way we can keep both atleast for next year.  IMO Hardy will be the better of the two going forward and if I had a choice would like to keep him long term.  Well there is a way. 

 

 

Johnsons contract is through to the 2016 season.  For 2014 Johnsons  cap figure will  be  16.4 million which is a lot and his dead money if he was cut is 16.2 so he wont be going anywhere next season.  But in 2015 is 17.4 his dead money 6 million. We could cut him or trade him and save 11.4 million in cap space.  So all we have to do for Hardy is figure a way to squeeze him n next season where we don't take a major cap hit. 

 

For Luke Beason is counting $8 million in cap money for 2014 so in 2015 we can just slide that to Luke so no issue there.  We could keep this defense next season if Hardy would work with us his first season.

 

The only question now is how we fit Cams contract in there too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

I was curious to know what dead money CJ would carry if being cut so thanks.

Also, like mentioned above CJ usually has the tougher match up. I've admitted to being on the sign Hardy bandwagon now after his recent performances. However, while CJ was out Hardy seemed to disappear. Hardy benefits greatly from the rest of the DL and CJ.

Hardy hasn't reached his ceiling yet and that's what is so intriguing about him. Gman has some tough decisions to make this offseason. One thing we can't afford, is to have Hardy walk away and get nothing in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

I was curious to know what dead money CJ would carry if being cut so thanks.

Also, like mentioned above CJ usually has the tougher match up. I've admitted to being on the sign Hardy bandwagon now after his recent performances. However, while CJ was out Hardy seemed to disappear. Hardy benefits greatly from the rest of the DL and CJ.

Hardy hasn't reached his ceiling yet and that's what is so intriguing about him. Gman has some tough decisions to make this offseason. One thing we can't afford, is to have Hardy walk away and get nothing in return.

Hardy plays RDE 80% of the time so he is taking on the better tackle the majority of the snaps.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sharkkiller Rookie

sharkkiller

Posted
Posted

I would say franchise Hardy this year and extend Cam. Then next year restructure CJ and then work on Hardy and Luke. The good part is that it would be another "contract year" for Hardy, not that I think it would make much difference with Kraken. 

 

The cap should jump a lot with the new TV contracts at that point.

 

Also, we have quite a bit of dead money that we will be rid of in the next year, so that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted

It will all be done with Cam and Luke in mind. But knowing how DG values the DL I would expect Hardy to be retained. Somewhere along the line this offseason Godfrey will be cut. I also expect multiple players to make their giant contract more cap friendly. Stewart, Dwill, and TD will need to step up. I could see them doing something similar to what Gross did. It'd be nice if Johnson would take a cut as well in his base and instead take some bonus money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frizzy350 Apprentice

Frizzy350

Posted
Posted

I have always been a strong believer that you cant keep both after this year.  It would lock up to much cap space over the next couple of years.  But I did some research and I can see a way we can keep both atleast for next year.  IMO Hardy will be the better of the two going forward and if I had a choice would like to keep him long term.  Well there is a way. 

 

 

Johnsons contract is through to the 2016 season.  For 2014 Johnsons  cap figure will  be  16.4 million which is a lot and his dead money if he was cut is 16.2 so he wont be going anywhere next season.  But in 2015 is 17.4 his dead money 6 million. We could cut him or trade him and save 11.4 million in cap space.  So all we have to do for Hardy is figure a way to squeeze him n next season where we don't take a major cap hit. 

 

For Luke Beason is counting $8 million in cap money for 2014 so in 2015 we can just slide that to Luke so no issue there.  We could keep this defense next season if Hardy would work with us his first season.

 

The only question now is how we fit Cams contract in there too. 

 

Charles Godfrey, Steve Smith (sorry but he isn't producing enough for the 7 mil I believe he's set to make next year, might retire too), Gross (might retire) and our running backs.  All that rolled up should be enough even if Cam's demands are absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • rayzor
      Snow in the high country

      By rayzor · Posted

      i think i go in the opposite direction of most. my ideal retirement is living in some old downtown area in a flat above some shop or something.  life out in the country was just something i got real tired of. My kids actually miss some of living out there, which i understand. that was where they grew up for the most part. 40 acres with a 2.5 acre pond. it was beautiful, but also way too much (and too expensive) for me to keep up with. 
    • MHS831
      Chuba Missile Crisies

      By MHS831 · Posted

      FLASHBACK: I remember back when ESPN was just starting--he was their anchor.  They used to show stuff like Rodeo and field hockey--I remember laughing when he went to a commercial mocking a cycling competition in Utah (or something similar--I made that up) and I laughed.  I told my dad, "We may have us a new anchor when we get back from commercial."  When they came back from commercial, Berman was looking very serious and he said, "Any comments by me do not reflect the views of ESPN....The men and women who cycle are dedicated athletes and we are honored to shine light on their sport." (Paraphrasing).  Dad laughed hysterically. My first memory of him--and that was like 1980.
    • djp14
      Canes vs Rangers 7pm(Happy Thanksgiving eve)

      By djp14 · Posted

      Might not have a team without them. Although that probably applies to the Panthers, too.
×
×
  • Create New...