Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kuechly not a Probowler according to PFF


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

matthew stafford back up pro bowl. lmfao, yep, a guy who single handedly destroyed his teams chances of going to the playoffs is an all pro. im mad they charge people for their garbage, seems like a huge scam to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke has played at a Pro Bowl level, but I don't think it blasphemy to say someone like Dansby, who destroyed us btw, deserves a spot above Kuechly. There were a lot of ILB's that have insanely good years this year.

It's not like they're trashing him. They're just saying others are more deserving, which is reasonable seeing as this was a very good but not unbelievable year for 59.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of those players had great years and Keek to.

 

What makes Keek so great is his brain, and that quality is hard to make statistic of.

 

What is important is... There is not a single ILB or MLB in the entire league I want over Keek. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Football is the ultimate team sport and he's right to a degree, but how is that different than any other player? Also, look at the turnaround that happened the game Luke moved to the middle. To try to dismiss any direct correlation between those two is impossible. Luke is as deserving as anyone in the league.

If you want to take issue with something take on the OLB in 43 vs 34 because TD and Lavonte David not going is a catastrophe.

This all day!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cant get more productivity if theres no more to be had. In this scheme Luke has played as close to 100% as I have ever witnessed any player play a position. He's missed a couple of tackles and had passes converted on him but he literally played as close to perfect as I've ever seen. Its been incredible to watch. Same as TD. Its amazing to watch them play.

 

PFF's system is the one of the best for assessing things on a larger scale, but it falters when you use it to examine individuals. You can see where guys had great games and great seasons but you cant see if there was more that he couldve done in that game. I heard Dansby was a maniac this year so thats fine, but Id like to know two things

 

1 How did Dansby do covering Jimmy Graham, Gronk, and an equivalent of Vernon Davis?

2 Does pff pool their thoughts for an article like this or was this more of an one writers efforts?. . . because they definitely favor different teams and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...