Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vick spent his first night of freedom at a strip club


dksmith17

Recommended Posts

The point is not that going to a scrip club is illegal, but the PERCEPTION on going to said scrip club. It's not illegal, and not immoral. But when you are trying to convince Roger Goodell, the league president, you have reformed from bad habits, going to a scrip club is not the best evidence.

No one is saying it's wrong, just that it's not the best thing to do to improve your image.

I don't see why that fact is so hard to understand.

How does it damage your image??

Bad Habit??

If the title of the thread was Vick seen buying 15 new pit bulls then Ok maybe we have an argument, Vicks problem was never strip clubs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I get the point that people are making. I just disagree with it

Cool. Actually I never really gave a poo. I don't care what vick does and I'm ashamed that I've wasted this much time talking about it. That being said.....I'm out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the three-hour-plus meeting that occurred Wednesday in New Jersey, Goodell told Vick one of his greatest concerns was the former Falcons quarterback's lifestyle prior to his prison confinement, including marijuana use, according to a source. Vick had a positive test for marijuana administered by federal authorities prior to his imprisonment, and one of the conditions of his NFL reinstatement will include evaluation and random urine testing for banned substances.

The truth is that it is not our decision to decide on whether the strip club visit is a "moot point." That decision belongs in the sole hands of the Roger Goodell.

All those that don't agree that the strip club visit reflects more bad than good on Vick's "lifestyle change" to Goodell are simply attempting to play devils advocate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Illegal isn't the discussion here. It's the decision making process. This is not what anyone would consider smart preperation for the biggest job interview of their life.

Bad judgement then, bad judgement now. You can't fix stupid.

Your post is proof of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...