Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dat Alice makes a thread on Saints Report.

PhillyB

By PhillyB,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

swoonychic Newbie

swoonychic

Posted
Posted

He/She/It lost any football credibility with "bad Panthers defense". I mean, really, c'mon, now you're just plain stupid.

 

And to leave the Saints and their "bad playcalling" to be a Cowboys fan? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

 

 

 

 

 

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

Oh my, my abs hurt from laughing so hard.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keep Steve Newbie

Keep Steve

Posted
Posted

I post here after every game, but usually in smack section. So now that I have a front page thread dedicate all to me, I'm using it Also, I'm not even talking about Phillys post job anymore anyway in case you missed it,?

Alright my friends are finally up, shopping time! I'm out! Woo hoo!

What is wrong with you?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Semaj Newbie

Semaj

Posted
Posted

So I was meandering around Saints Report dot com a bit ago and came across this absolute gold mine of a thread. Our old pal Dat Alice has a comedic meltdown on the main page, spewing bitter tears across Metarie, LA's interwebs. He's changed his name to BigSaintsFan9 (lololololol) and as you can see from the following screen cap he's about as popular with his own fanbase as he is with ours.

As you can also see, we probably won't be hearing from him again. Fare thee well, Alejandro, portly chum, we won't miss you at all.

Posted Image

Out of all the teams to switch your allegiance to. THE COWBOYS! LOL!!! ROFLMAO!!!!! Good luck with that Alejandro. I could understand the Pats or Broncos, but Dallas. All they do is choke and underperform. And ur right Op, that is him. Bragging about his mommy and daddies money, blaming refs and telling us how the Saints really won the game because the stats say so.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Trying a lot harder? Half the stuff you wrote in that post is dumb and not even factually accurate. I'm pretty sure the average fan is smart enough to know its fake considering what posts I did make last night was about how great the team played and how I think they win in a third meeting after losing a game they dominated for 59 minutes. The ones you are trolling and actually believe your newest photoshop job, well they are probably the same ones that originally fell for the fake match,com profile you photoshopped before I posted the guys real one and those mental midgets are not really my concern.

I love how they dominated for 59 minutes....

Yet trailed at the end of the first half......trailed at the start of the 4th and ultimately lost.

One 4th q TD by NO isn't dominating a game. Luke dominated that game. That was the only domination on Sunday.

Also your coach entered that game with a desperate mindset and coached like a scared man. I don't know who that guy was....but I am glad he coaches NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rhys Newbie

Rhys

Posted
Posted

I highly enjoy your squirming when it comes to the actual game, DrewBreesIsGod(-AwfulOnTheRoad). You continue to cling to certain statistics as some kind of proof that if a rematch happens in January the Saints would win. And you also site the Armstead/Hardy situation as another reason why suddenly your offense is going to score at will on our defense if only Brown plays.

 

To counter, let's first look at one of your former-fellow Who Dats response ( I pinky swear I didn't photoshop that large rainbow fish over-top the message, double, no triple pinky-swear ) - 

 

23u4pye.jpg

 

Ahh, what a salient point. Why don't we take a look at those precious stats?

 

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010012401/2009/POST20/vikings@saints#menu=highlights&tab=analyze&analyze=boxscore

 

Hmm, wow. Looks like the Vikings won that one, wait what? They didn't? Nope, your classy former-franchise went on to win that game in pussified fashion with a long field goal after hitting Favre explicitly after the whistle on multiple occasions, getting flagged for it, and getting out gained in the air and on the ground and in the TOP.

 

On to your next toothpick-tower argument: in the first encounter this season between the Panthers and Saints, Byron Bell was criticized heavily for giving up almost all of the significant pressure on Cam which lead to field goals on the opening two-drives and to multiple stalls throughout the game.

 

I could just as easily say, "All that has to happen is Byron Bell play a better game and we will obliterate Rob Ryan's Finest." But I'm not as selectively-blind as you. Galette and Jordan are good players, who at times can take over games. Same goes for Hardy and Johnson (who was not playing fully healthy need I remind you). They didn't play up to their potential in NO, but the entire D-line generated more pressure in this past game. What makes you think Brown is so consistent that he would have been able to stop Hardy after getting clown-suited by Quinn a week earlier? 

 

Let's summarize: You're an ass-clown who can't stomach the loss so you deflect with shitty silver-linings that Saints fans don't even agree with.

 

(aside: if you knew anything about Photoshop you'd know that if PhillyB did shop the image, the text would have a drop-shadow and a bevel+emboss because anyone who is good at PS knows those effects aren't played out, and totally still cool)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...