Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sheldon Richardson "making" some noise. Says he'd go #1 in re-do

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

I keep seeing Huddlers saying "Richardson is good...surprisingly"

This is why you do not work in an NFL office and post on the internets. These GMs, scouts and most draft experts are kinda ok at this.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

There's busts and steals every year.  Always has been, always will be.  If we can't sit around and talk out of our asses about baseless speculation, then what's the point of this board?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted

Admittedly, I've really only paid close attention to one Jet game, and that was the last one against Oakland.

 

At least in that game, Richardson didn't really stand out to me. The ones that did were Coples (rush LB'er) and Pace (DL).

 

The Jets have a damn good front 7 and can create lots of pressure. Luckily, their offense is not too scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashNDash Newbie

SmashNDash

Posted
Posted

Richardson has 66 tackles and 3.5 sacks. Excellent numbers for a DT, not to mention a rookie DT.

Well his numbers are abnormal to us because he's really paying DE in a lot of their packages, so I wouldn't really count him as a DT.  Nonetheless, it would be hard to argue that he or Star wouldn't get #1 overall if there was a redraft, at least a redraft based upon immediate impact.  At the same time, I couldn't tell you if Eric Fisher and Luke Jockel are doing well or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

Admittedly, I've really only paid close attention to one Jet game, and that was the last one against Oakland.

At least in that game, Richardson didn't really stand out to me. The ones that did were Coples (rush LB'er) and Pace (DL).

The Jets have a damn good front 7 and can create lots of pressure. Luckily, their offense is not too scary.

He's a defensive lineman in a 3 man front. His production isn't supposed to be expressed in stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Golden Child Newbie

The Golden Child

Posted
Posted

Well his numbers are abnormal to us because he's really paying DE in a lot of their packages, so I wouldn't really count him as a DT.  Nonetheless, it would be hard to argue that he or Star wouldn't get #1 overall if there was a redraft, at least a redraft based upon immediate impact.  At the same time, I couldn't tell you if Eric Fisher and Luke Jockel are doing well or not.

Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sean Payton's Vicodin Grand Master

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Posted
Posted

Well his numbers are abnormal to us because he's really paying DE in a lot of their packages, so I wouldn't really count him as a DT.  Nonetheless, it would be hard to argue that he or Star wouldn't get #1 overall if there was a redraft, at least a redraft based upon immediate impact.  At the same time, I couldn't tell you if Eric Fisher and Luke Jockel are doing well or not.

 

Please don't tell me he'll be lined up against bell

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

I keep seeing Huddlers saying "Richardson is good...surprisingly"

This is why you do not work in an NFL office and post on the internets. These GMs, scouts and most draft experts are kinda ok at this.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

This same thing was said through the Hurney years. Look what happened lolll

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted

He's a defensive lineman in a 3 man front. His production isn't supposed to be expressed in stats

 

Yeah, I wasn't really speaking from a stats standpoint. It had more to do with the eyeball test as to whether or not he was disruptive, and how he did versus the run.

 

For at least that 1 game, he didn't really stand out in either area. I'm sure he's had plenty of other games in which he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...