Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our offense style / scheme is not gonna cut it

Dash Global

By Dash Global,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Dash Global Newbie

Dash Global

Posted
Posted

I have never got the whole "we need to be a time control / conservative / establish the run" offense. 

 

That is only good for inferior teams HOPING to keep the game close. 

 

We should WANT to be an explosive high scoring offense. Plain and fugging simple. 

 

No reason why we cant march down the field quickly and score a TD. Then kick off and get a 3 n out and go score again. Rinse and repeat. Fug this notion it will tire our D or any other excuse to why we should be conservative on offense. 

 

The offense ALWAYS have the upper hand, so when we face QBs like Manning, Brees, Brady, Rodgers they will shred our D. Their is always an answer for what ever the D is doing. Getting pressure ok quick 3 step routes. Playing man ok comebacks, drags/crosses, slants etc. Playing zone ok we will flood and/or find the holes. Light box ok we will run. Load the box ok we will pass. Play inside technique ok out routes. Play outside technique ok inside slants. Bring the safeties down ok over the top. I could go on and on. No matter how good your D is you will not be able to stop elite QBs and OCs every night. You must be able to match them score for score. IE We need to be AVERAGING 28+ ppg. 

 

We have faced 2 elite QBs this year and both of them SHREDDED our D. Brady marched right down the field on literally every possession. Only reason we won was because their D sucked and we were able to match the score for score. Not to mention getting help from the refs late. 

 

In todays NFL Cam should be averaging 300+ pass yards per game. With the RBs getting about 100+ yards a game. 

 

If your QB is averaging 200 pass yards a game you better be averaging 200-300 yards rushing a game. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dash Global Newbie

Dash Global

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Getting beat by NO in the dome results in this?

 

Good God.

 

OK.  I guess we suck now?

 

This loss has NOTHING to do with the simple fact we need to change our philosophy on O. 

 

The only thing this loss does is highlight the fact (along with the NE game) that elite QBs can and will shred elite Ds. The offense will always have the upper hand. 

 

We must be able to match them score for score and generally speaking you better be putting up 24-28 ppg when facing the likes of Manning, Brady, Brees, and Rodgers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rubi Experienced

Rubi

Posted
Posted

We don't attack anybody on offense any more. We aim to control clock instead of being aggressive and really opening up the play book. As our defense has gotten better it's like we shifted to this very vanilla deal.

Vanilla sucks. We need more flavor

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest shitposting

Guest shitposting

Posted
Posted

A balance offense is good but this balance offense of ours is def the cover up of having no legitimate no1 receiver.

 

If Cam wasn't money our balance would be completely fuged. We need a WR so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

BS. We had an explosive O in 2011.

We are a ball control offense.

That is for scared pussies.

The play calling is conservative.

We had a better OL in 2011 and 2 year younger version of 89....

Makes a difference

Ball control and playing a style that matches your overall team......has us at 9-4 with 3 to go. Chud ball gives you offensive stats and losses

Based on the weak talent around Cam and strong D.....conservative is smart football. Hence all the wins.

1 game, 1 horrific quarter. We will move on. It happens......has to NO, Den, KC etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      Passing yards per game leaders

      By mav1234 · Posted

      I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • mav1234
      BREAKING: Panthers Announce Four Moves Including LB Trevin Wallace To IR

      By mav1234 · Posted

      I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Gapanthersfan
      Would you trade Ickey

      By Gapanthersfan · Posted

      Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...