-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.gif.f35aad759896324c3e174efcba5a66a6.gif)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is. I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him. So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too. Which is just going to happen. -
Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards. -
By Bear Hands · Posted
Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush. But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will. He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable. It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see. It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works. It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.