Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grantland: Rivera Made Best Coaching Moves of the Week


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

And if we would have lost, he would look like he doesn't know what he is doing. I hate these kind of arguments. We had to go for it on 4th and 10 at our own 20. Not saying Ron is a bad coach, but you would like to not have to be in that position. He still has a lot of making up to do in my book. Again, not trying to bash on Rivera, just trying to respond to the thread topic. I just hate how analysts contrive these argument post hoc.

If I may interject perhaps it's like when you know you have the hottest dual threat qb in the league on a 4th and 10 down by 3 and there's not much time left it's a good call to go for it, but when you call timeouts with the clock running down to 0 to close out the half so that the other team can get their field goal unit out and comfortably strut to the field and not have to rush it's a bad call?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest changes during our winning streak has been our halftime adjustments.   Last year and earlier this year, it seemed like we always got out-coached and out-adjusted coming out of the locker room for the 2cd half.  During our winning streak, we have consistently been a better 2cd half team than our opponents.  Props to Rivera and company. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if we would have lost, he would look like he doesn't know what he is doing.  I hate these kind of arguments.  We had to go for it on 4th and 10 at our own 20.  Not saying Ron is a bad coach, but you would like to not have to be in that position.  He still has a lot of making up to do in my book.  Again, not trying to bash on Rivera, just trying to respond to the thread topic.  I just hate how analysts contrive these argument post hoc.

 

Actually even if we would have lost, it still would have been the correct call. Look at the time differential between him calling them when he did vs. if he had waited. The argument is based on facts/statistics - not post hoc observations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if we lose?

 

I bracketed my comment with a "I'm not bashing the decision" disclaimer, yet you still take offense to it.  And just because "all sports commentary is post-hoc," [and accepting that as true] that doesn't make it correct; 2 + 2 still equals 4 no matter what the masses say.  You can still report post-game without crafting your opinion on the outcome, and I believe you are confusing the two.

 

 

Zod please ban "IF" just like curse words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...