Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

59 total offensive yards in first half


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Guest shitposting

Gettleman not paying for offensive lineman. Let's just use a DT, it's not like Carolina has a chance this year.

 

Am I right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll need to make some obvious second half adjustments. Overall, the defense is playing pretty well (excepting two big play Capt' gave up). Cam looks a little shaken since the Cameron Wake hit. I think we need to go back to Tolbert/Williams leading the running game. Stewart looks flat out there. That second field goal helped us immensely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what is up with our playcalling?

 

Agree. Our coaching was terrible the first half, topped by challenging plays we shouldn't have, losing all of our time outs early and not having our guys ready. I agree with @Doyle that we simply look flat. No answers. Hoping we come out like a different team in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman not paying for offensive lineman. Let's just use a DT, it's not like Carolina has a chance this year.

 

Am I right?

 

LOL Dude we have 10 million in cap. But we have to sign Hardy at the end of the season and Cam next year. Our oline has played fine in the past 6 weeks. Miami has just beat us at our own game today. We just got to play better.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...