Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After we beat the Taints in the Dome, RR will be above .500

Mother Grabber

By Mother Grabber,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

You guys will be destroyed Sunday night in New Orleans! You have no chance in hell cry now. Cry to the media to switch it back to an afternoon game because you aren't beating us at home in primetime with that shitty secondary! It will be picked apart

Not going to lie. This was actually pretty cute. It reminds me of my redneck nephew. He's chuck full of dour consequences to crossing him. Him? He's 6, and its cute. That is cute you just can't buy.

Good luck with that whole, we have a defense now too, I think. It should protect you from everything, well...except maybe the weather.

Ooh ooh ooh, lest we forget. Once the game ends, and your azz has been sufficiently spanked. We get to fly out of there to clean fresh air. Your players are still stuck in sewer town. I was in Mobile, Al. last week, I swear I could still smell NO. Sad really. She was such a slick ***** in her days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherFanOne Newbie

PantherFanOne

Posted
Posted

incidentally, when Breesus first entered the league he was questioned about having his mole removed.  He denied emphatically ever doing it, saying something to the effect of, "This is how God made me...."  I guess $100M changed his mind about creationism.  Either that, or it was the hookers down on Iberville St.

 

 

15331055.jpg It could be worse,Drew Brees could have looked like this nerd. The president of the Saints fan club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted

You guys will be destroyed Sunday night in New Orleans! You have no chance in hell cry now. Cry to the media to switch it back to an afternoon game because you aren't beating us at home in primetime with that shitty secondary! It will be picked apart

We've faced offenses like yours and won. You've faced defenses like ours and lost. Be scared asshole

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Cajun Mentor

Carolina Cajun

Posted
Posted

as I see it, the only legit contenders are:

 

NFC: Seattle, SF, NO, Carolina

AFC: NE, Denver, (iffy on the Bengals)

 

We have a real, solid chance at getting to the NFCC and Superbowl....and we'll only get better.

 

dynasty

 

Just to add, darkhorse in the NFC would be Green Bay, if they survive next week against a struggling Detroit team, Aaron Rodgers comes back, and they're a team that can get really hot.  I'd actually have them over SF, I don't think SF is going anywhere this year until Kaepernick gets his poo together, which I'm not even sure he'll ever be the QB people thought he was.  I'd say NFC's most likely team is Seattle, followed by Taints/Panthers almost dead even, and GB as the #4 as a darkhorse.  In the AFC, it's a 2 team race, and if anyone outside of NE or Denver make the superbowl, I'll be shocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just to add, darkhorse in the NFC would be Green Bay, if they survive next week against a struggling Detroit team, Aaron Rodgers comes back, and they're a team that can get really hot.  I'd actually have them over SF, I don't think SF is going anywhere this year until Kaepernick gets his poo together, which I'm not even sure he'll ever be the QB people thought he was.  I'd say NFC's most likely team is Seattle, followed by Taints/Panthers almost dead even, and GB as the #4 as a darkhorse.  In the AFC, it's a 2 team race, and if anyone outside of NE or Denver make the superbowl, I'll be shocked.

 

My initial thought to this is that the Packers don't have enough defense to hang.  If you look at the NFC candidates, they are all ranked top 5 in scoring defense:

 

1. Car - 13.7ppg

2. Sea - 16.3ppg

4. SF - 16.7ppg

5. NO - 17.8ppg

 

18. GB - 24.1ppg, a full TD more/game than the other 4 and 10ppg more than us.

 

However, when you look at the AFC candidates, which we all seem to agree is a two horse race, they are:

 

9. NE - 20.9ppg

26(!) Den - 26.3ppg - tied with the Texans

 

We've thought of Denver as having an elite D this year (because we listen to the media too much), but here they sit at the bottom of the league in scoring D.  They've given up 10 rushing TDs and an astounding 21 passing TDs (we've given up 12 TDs total).

 

While I initially wouldn't have thought that GB was legit based on their D, they are in better shape then Denver in that category.  The Pats at least seem to be somewhat balanced with the #9 D, but Denver is clearly winning shoot outs every game (when Denver faced decent D (twice, KC and NE) they still put up 30pts).  Not quite what one would expect from Foxball, eh?  If Rodgers can get the GB offense back up to the 30ppg category, then I agree, they have to be put back into the discussion.  NFC is stacked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Cajun Mentor

Carolina Cajun

Posted
Posted

My initial thought to this is that the Packers don't have enough defense to hang.  If you look at the NFC candidates, they are all ranked top 5 in scoring defense:

 

1. Car - 13.7ppg

2. Sea - 16.3ppg

4. SF - 16.7ppg

5. NO - 17.8ppg

 

18. GB - 24.1ppg, a full TD more/game than the other 4 and 10ppg more than us.

 

However, when you look at the AFC candidates, which we all seem to agree is a two horse race, they are:

 

9. NE - 20.9ppg

26(!) Den - 26.3ppg - tied with the Texans

 

We've thought of Denver as having an elite D this year (because we listen to the media too much), but here they sit at the bottom of the league in scoring D.  They've given up 10 rushing TDs and an astounding 21 passing TDs (we've given up 12 TDs total).

 

While I initially wouldn't have thought that GB was legit based on their D, they are in better shape then Denver in that category.  The Pats at least seem to be somewhat balanced with the #9 D, but Denver is clearly winning shoot outs every game (when Denver faced decent D (twice, KC and NE) they still put up 30pts).  Not quite what one would expect from Foxball, eh?  If Rodgers can get the GB offense back up to the 30ppg category, then I agree, they have to be put back into the discussion.  NFC is stacked!

 

I agree, but we've seen over the past few years that a team with a so-so defense, but a stud QB can get hot in the playoffs and make up for their defensive deficiencies.  Rodgers and Eli Manning both did it recently and thats why I consider them dangerous as a dark horse.  I'm in no way scared of anything the East will send or Chicago or Detroit, but GB poses a threat of a League and Superbowl MVP making them very dangerous.  My hope was that by this point, they'd be out of the hunt for the division and/or wildcard, but Detroit and Chicago have essentially collapsed.  If they win the game thursday, they become a dangerous team.  With that said, I still think the panthers, Saints, and Seahawks are the more likely candidates because of the combination of dynamic QB's plus good defenses.

 

Could you imagine what the superbowl lead up would be like should we face NE.  The news would be split between it being a rematch from 10 years ago and the keuchly end of the game call/non-call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...