Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football Gameplan's 2013 Wk 11 Preview - Panthers vs Patriots


FootballCzar

Recommended Posts

i like it. keep up the good work.

 

would it be fairto say that the team that can make the other team be one dimensional on offense will win the game?

 

also, can you elaborate a  little more on the pats "hurry up to slow down" or however it was phrased?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like it. keep up the good work.

 

would it be fairto say that the team that can make the other team be one dimensional on offense will win the game?

 

also, can you elaborate a  little more on the pats "hurry up to slow down" or however it was phrased?

 

Thanks Rayzor!  Yep that the key, the 1st one to take away the other's main strength has the best shot.. That's why its important to win 2/3 phases of a game. The "Hurry up to Slow down" statement is mainly geared toward being a hurry up offense, going no-huddle yet taking your time to snap the ball in an attempt to minimize substitutions.

 

 

love this. your 'white board' segments are great

 

hope your prediction is right

 

Thanks BP! I'm looking to enhance those White Board segments..any thoughts?

 

Good stuff

 

Thanks KJ!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job.

We need to get you a modern intro.

 

Thanks! LOL! Its designed to have that 'old school' sound and feel..you know, back when:

 

1. Games actually started at the time it was scheduled

2. Pre-game shows actually previewed the games

3. No more than 3 analysts at a desk

4. Before it became too commercial

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely, I know a good bit about football, but Ive never had anyone delve as deeply into play design as Em does.  It's a really interesting facet that the NFLN and ESPN don't do, or if they do, don't do as well.

 

Thanks Cajun! It's my way of staying 'in tuned' with the coaching aspect of it.. I miss coaching a lot, but I also love being able to break down games of the different leagues.. So I try to satisfy both interests. I see another outlet 'competitively borrowing' my style but the person they have is all Jargon..which is okay if you know what he's saying but to the average fan, they get lost in the translation. I like to teach, inform and explain the 'why' when I'm at the whiteboard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Rayzor!  Yep that the key, the 1st one to take away the other's main strength has the best shot.. That's why its important to win 2/3 phases of a game. The "Hurry up to Slow down" statement is mainly geared toward being a hurry up offense, going no-huddle yet taking your time to snap the ball in an attempt to minimize substitutions.

 

 

figured that might be what you were talking about. panthers took the opposite strategy this year. instead of hurry up we have a "take your own sweet time" approach that eats up the clock and keeps the other offense off the field.

 

both teams will try to set the pace, but this one thing comes to mind when i see this...i think of hiking with a group of people and trying to remember that you are only as fast as your slowest member. the pats will try to rush things and get a poo ton of plays and possessions as possible thinking that moving quickly will bring about both and a lot of points as well, but they can only go as fast as we will let them.

 

i've been wanting to see these two idealogies go head to head. i think we saw a glimpse of it against the bills, but it was at a point in time where things weren't gelling all that well on offense or defense and it wasn't on our turf.

 

i think their hurry up offense will help us more than our slow pace will help them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one is asking him to be Tom Brady. They're just asking him to be as good if not better than Cooper Rush, Jimmy Garoppolo and Carson Wentz. We'd like Young to be better than Sam Darnold and Baker Mayfield, but we're not even asking for that. No matter how you cut it he's going to be considered a bust for what was given up for him. He should be outpacing Cam Newton, Jake Delhomme and Kerry Collins game for game in their careers. He should at least be challenging the clutch level of Brady, Mahomes, Stafford, Goff, Garoppolo, Burrow, Hurts and Purdy. Remember that's based on the draft capital given up for Young, and not the extremely low bar Young has actually set for himself.
    • Even if you cherry pick Bryce post benching and ignore everything else and project it out over a full season….. there is no statistical  argument Kyler has ever been worse.   I’m no Murray fan as I agree he is more athlete than QB.   And I’m open to Bryce improving and support us continuing to develop him as this point.  
    • We need LBs--build the roster from the bottom up.  On offense, we have Coker who has been huge...if you fill your weaknesse without having to use free agent $$$ or draft picks--win win.
×
×
  • Create New...