Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First Take 11/11/13 Carolina vs San Fran


Dex

Recommended Posts

Good stuff Dex,

It kills me how Skip and other media outlets make excuses and say San. Fran would have won if ......

San Fran would have won if this person would have been playing......

Injuries are part of the game we have lost our first and second team guards yet we don't make excuses about starting a defensive tackle at guard.

Yeah we could play that "what if" game too.   What if they didn't recover a punt we blocked oddly enough?  What if they would have called that Vernon Davis fumble correctly?  What if Smitty wouldn't have dropped that long pass over the middle on 3rd down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quick everyone get offended that noted ignoramus skip bayless didn't oil our johnson

i'm always amazed that anyone ever wastes their time or energy watching that guy...or pretty much anything on espn.

 

he's not even entertaining and listening to those two hacks "argue" is a more annoying fake fight than anything pro wrestling has to offer.

 

i can't ever handle more than a minute of those guys before i just have to turn it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not their job to watch film. This leads to shoddy journalism and over generalizations more often than not. The sports casting world will know a lot more on November 19th if we are able to pull it out just because everyone will have access to the game. That said, he is right about Kuechly.

I have a feeling that was a blown coverage and Kuechly recognized the call as soon as he saw the tight end split the seam. Something went wrong in the pre snap call and there wasn't going to be a safety there which Kuechly recognized almost immediately.

That's not based on anything other than how the play unfolded and how unscripted it seemed to be that Kuechly was 30 yards down field with no safety within 5 yards.

Don't bash me for this interpretation because that's all it is, an interpretation, I could be wrong.

 

IMO it's a perfectly reasonable interpretation. In the moment I was only super happy that the receiver couldn't hold on to the ball. But now I do realize just how weird it was for Keek to be so far downfield. Heads up hustle play by him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good stuff Dex,

It kills me how Skip and other media outlets make excuses and say San. Fran would have won if ......

San Fran would have won if this person would have been playing......

Injuries are part of the game we have lost our first and second team guards yet we don't make excuses about starting a defensive tackle at guard.

And third Kug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not their job to watch film. This leads to shoddy journalism and over generalizations more often than not. The sports casting world will know a lot more on November 19th if we are able to pull it out just because everyone will have access to the game. That said, he is right about Kuechly.

I have a feeling that was a blown coverage and Kuechly recognized the call as soon as he saw the tight end split the seam. Something went wrong in the pre snap call and there wasn't going to be a safety there which Kuechly recognized almost immediately.

That's not based on anything other than how the play unfolded and how unscripted it seemed to be that Kuechly was 30 yards down field with no safety within 5 yards.

Don't bash me for this interpretation because that's all it is, an interpretation, I could be wrong.

I thought the same thing. I said to myself why is there no safety over the top of a linebacker when the play is downfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not their job to watch film. This leads to shoddy journalism and over generalizations more often than not. The sports casting world will know a lot more on November 19th if we are able to pull it out just because everyone will have access to the game. That said, he is right about Kuechly.

I have a feeling that was a blown coverage and Kuechly recognized the call as soon as he saw the tight end split the seam. Something went wrong in the pre snap call and there wasn't going to be a safety there which Kuechly recognized almost immediately.

That's not based on anything other than how the play unfolded and how unscripted it seemed to be that Kuechly was 30 yards down field with no safety within 5 yards.

Don't bash me for this interpretation because that's all it is, an interpretation, I could be wrong.

In a cover two defense the MLB is responsible for the deep middle.

With our dbs playing better.....we are now running more cover two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...