Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is an HTPC? How much? Etc?


the butch

Recommended Posts

Other than Home Theatre Personal Computer, I know nothing about them.  Was chatting with someone about having to use a tethered connection from my computer to my TV when watching ESPN3, iTunes, etc.  He said to just get an HTPC set-up.  I acted all like, "Yeah, man.  Great idea.  Should probably."  When I really should have been like, "WTF, you nerd.  What the hell is that?  Get a life."  So, it got me thinking, would it really be worth the money?  Right now I have my TV mounted above my fireplace with the DirecTV Genie in my coat closet [uses RF remote].  What say you, Huddle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better questions you should answer before embarking the perilous path of the HTPC:

 

1.  Do you really "NEED" one?  What jobs will it perform that your current devices don't?

2.  Want to build one?  There are a ton of good cases out there and components galore.  So the question is, do you want to get your hands dirty (not dirty but...) and build one?  Way cheaper that buying a prebuilt.

3.  Do you know what software you want to use and how?  Like are you going to hook it up to an antenna and use it as an OTA recorder to save some DVR space?  Will you be using it to push your downloaded from "questionable origins" content around the house?  

4.  Or do you make your life easier and get an apple TV?  I bring up that object simply because it meets 99% of the needs of MOST people.  It's $100.

 

You really have to figure out what you are going to do with a HTPC before you jump in the deep end.  I wish you luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HTPC is not for everyone. It's a hobby as much as entertainment setup.

 

My upstairs HTPC was an old desktop PC. You don't need alot of horsepower to watch movies. You can buy video cards that can play blu-ray rips for <$10.

 

But Apple TV, a Roku, WD Live, etc...will suit 95% of everyone's needs.

As ddave mentions, all depends on what you are going to do with it. Are you streaming videos from websites, playing dvd/BD rips, mp3s...or the questionable sourced .mkvs.

 

If you run windowns (vista/7/8), Mediabrowser is a nice front end but alot of people like using XBMC.

You will spend time to setup everything and I still tweak mine (changing themes, etc)

I also record HD OTA using a silicondust box.

 

AVSforum.com has a forum dedicated to HTPCs, they also have a section for media boxes (appletv, roku, many other little known boxes) New to the scene are android boxes that have an HDMI port that can stream media.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input, guys.  I don't understand 99% of it, but I got the bit about Apple TV.  I guess I would like the ability to burn my collection of DVDs and then trash the hard copies.  I know, I know, copyright violation, but whatever.  I would also like the ability to store game content for football, basketball, and baseball.  Again, I am not even sure how the whole thing works.  Can it go to multiple TVs?  Multiple computers?  Can you access content when you are away from home, e.g., vacation, business, etc.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...