Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Rivera Changed After Buffalo


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

When RR decided to grow a pair, he grew some big ones.

That's our Ron. When he goes, he goes all in.

 

 

I can't get past Buffalo either. I really think that is going to be what keeps us out of the playoffs. If we win on Sunday then we can all put Buffalo to bed and move on towards winning the Division.

 

You sound like Monk. Now, everyone is happy.

 

Good for Ron for opening up his mind and changing the way he works. A lot of coaches never get over that. They're too stubborn to change up what they thought was right when it wasn't helping them succeed. Before this Ron's head coaching career was pretty much dead to rights, but now we finally may have something. It looks like the guy we saw Hurney introduce as a head coach in a press conference in January 2011 has finally shown up.

You know how I know things are going pretty well? A positive post from FB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Rivera changed? His damn job was on the line. Duh what else.

Dude...you sure can spread the joy of life can't you? You must be a real treat at the dinner table.

Every Coach that signs a contract is one day closer to being fired. Comes with the job. At least our Coach is willing to self evaluate, learn, and grow. Hey, those are traits we can all use in every day life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron put faith in the defense to stop a rookie QB with no timeouts and a TD behind. I would've too. Still can't figure out how they marched on our defense that way. I really can't blame him for the FG.

It's just the way it all unfolded. They helped us get into FG range to begin with. You had to feel they were ready to throw this game away. But nooooooo.

And with Rivera being a defensive, pretty much by the book, minded coach, he truly thought he'd made the right call at the time.

Little did he know...it was a turning point in his career. He has gone from thinking he was aggressive, to actually being aggressive. And his team has bought in.

If all goes to plan. We are now in stage 2 in the building of Rome. 1st stage, play good solid physical football. 2nd stage, learn how to win and finish. We are close to the 3rd step, competing for Titles and Championships.

Rivera gots this. With help from Gettlemen. Our culture has gone from a clusterfug of WTF? moments, to things falling our way. Well...except for that pesky O-line situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy poo, Rivera almost fuging died thinking about Buffalo.  Seems like he's seriously made a change and not just trying to say the right things.

 

That's gonna be our slogan if we make continue winning and make it to the playoffs...

 

"Remember Buffalo"

 

quick someone PM akpantherfan and tell him to make this into a banner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats a really good question. My guess is that if he goes for 4th-1 late in single possession game and we ultimately lose there will be a great many around here who cant get back on the "Fire Rivera" side quick enough.

No shame in going down fighting, unless it's some retarded play action with long developing routes on 4th and inches.

All we want him to do is to NOT coach scared. If we go for the jugular but fail, it's not on Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we lose next Sunday, you guys will be calling for his head. Life of a head coach I guess.

 

Don´t think so. RR changed his coaching mind from "play not to lose" to "play to win". People (including me) wanted his head because of his "play not to lose" attitude. Since he got rid of it he earned a lot of credit back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...