Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Since everyone else is doing stats!


Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Recommended Posts

I commonly use my own statistical formula to predict game scores for sports betting.  It has proven to be remarkably accurate and I almost don't want to share it, but here we go.

 

In order to determine the final score of the game I take each teams points scored against the opponent, and subtract it from the points scored on average for each opponent.  

 

The Panthers currently hold teams on average 7.575 points below their average for the season.  The 49ers currently hold teams 2.825 points below their average for the season.  If we subtract these scores from each teams average points scored for the season Panthers (25.5) and 49ers (27.3), we should have a relatively accurate prediction of the outcome.

 

Statistically we win this game 22.675 to 19.725

 

Sadly, the difference in the scores falls within 1SD (approx 7 points) of each other, so the prediction is pretty useless.  But, it does show that we are slightly favored.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I commonly use my own statistical formula to predict game scores for sports betting. It has proven to be remarkably accurate and I almost don't want to share it, but here we go.

In order to determine the final score of the game I take each teams points scored against the opponent, and subtract it from the points scored on average for each opponent.

The Panthers currently hold teams on average 7.575 points below their average for the season. The 49ers currently hold teams 2.825 points below their average for the season. If we subtract these scores from each teams average points scored for the season Panthers (25.5) and 49ers (27.3), we should have a relatively accurate prediction of the outcome.

Statistically we win this game 22.675 to 19.725

Sadly, the difference in the scores falls within 1SD (approx 7 points) of each other, so the prediction is pretty useless. But, it does show that we are slightly favored.

nice how did u come up with tht formula

Sent from my SGH-T999L using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice how did u come up with tht formula

Sent from my SGH-T999L using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

The formula is the only way I can think to quantify a teams defensive capabilities while simultaneously factoring out strength of schedule.  It has its flaws.  For example, it doesn't take into account any human variables, weather, or even home field advantage.  it is strictly "this team scores this much on average, the target team (49ers + Panthers) held them to this."  It makes a ton of assumptions, but because it deals in averages over time, it becomes more accurate as the season progresses.

 

So have you retrotested and if so how has your model done?

 

The model works much better for teams that do not have high variance in the differential between Points Against Target and Points Against Season Average.  

The Panthers have differentials of (-13.8, 3, -17.6, 1.3, -13.3, -5.7, -2.5, -12)  This have a an average of -7.575 and a standard deviation of 7.67!  So if a team averages 27.3 points per game, 68% of the time, they will score between 11.83 and 27.4. scoring on average 19.725 points against the Panthers.   Because the standard deviation of 7.67 is so high, it leaves us with a wide margin of possibility being statistically possible.

 

Teams with a smaller variance like say the 49ers (-1, 3.2, 0.2, -9.7, -15.3, -0.7, 1.5, -0.8) with an average of -2.825 and a standard deviation of 6.3  meaning that the Panthers who score on average 25.5 points per game, would have a range of 16.375 to 28.975 (68% of the time) with an average of 22.675.  (They also have a HUGE outlier, there game against the Texans, but we shall save outlier detection and winsorized means for another time)

 

So Technically speaking, the game has a 68% chance that the scores fall

Panthers 16.375 - 28.975

49ers 11.83 - 27.4

 

Though that isn't a strong statement, it is extremely helpful in determining my bets for the weekend.  I only bet 2 or 3 games a week, and I am pretty solid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed on the last part. They can’t afford to lose all these games with Martin and Perets. 
    • Yes.  And this converts directly to confidence.  Does the coach have confidence to call a deep dig or seam route?  Does Bryce have confidence in his ability to be the Alpha?  Do his teammates have confidence.  About film--when I see Cam Newton's pre-snap confidence vs. Bryce's, it is night and day.   Film--tells you if the WRs are open (why l love watching the Replay telecasts from the end zone cameras--you can see it.  I have seen 2 WRs open and Bryce's eyes are on the outlet WR or the pass rush. )  You can see progressions, and he has improved a bit--but he is very quick to rush through 1 and 2 and checkdown--that is a lack of confidence in his ability to read the defense.  I had a former NFL TE (Deems Maye) who played QB in high school (not sure about college) tell me that the best QBs read the defense by knowing where everyone will be when the ball is to arrive--not where they are.  I think his QB at the time was Humphries.  He said that Humphries would throw the ball into coverage before the cuts etc.  because he understood DB momentum, zone areas, etc.  and he could just see it.  Said so when people say nobody was open, they are usually right because nobody should be "open" when the QB has the ball--when the ball arrives, everyone should be open.  He said Humphries was never "great" but his skills were limited--from a small school--but his ability to read a defense made him never give up on a route.
    • People here get mad when I tell them I prefer Miracle Whip over Dukes
×
×
  • Create New...