Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PS4 or Xbox1?

chubs2496

By chubs2496,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

PanthersClinic Newbie

PanthersClinic

Posted
Posted

I preordered the PS4 but I did so with free shipping so It's not expected until 11/20-11/23.

 

The PS4 launch lineup is very poor. Knack is very average and Killzone is a dull sequel from what I've read. Really the PS4 has the weakest launch lineup of the three consoles. The Wii U with Super Mario Bros U, Nintendo Land and Zombi U was a better lineup.

 

Xbox One has the best game lineup at launch. Dead Rising, Ryse, Forza, those are impressive launch titles.

 

I typically buy all the Sony and Nintendo consoles and handhelds as I prefer the Japanese games like Mario, Final Fantasy, Tales,  etc.

 

I'll probably pick up Battlefield 4. I don't really like FPS games but I hear it has stunning graphics and will be something to show the system off with. Can't believe there is no Little Big Planet, Gran Turismo, Final Fantasy, Uncharted, etc. Even one of these games would've been nice.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

 

I'll probably pick up Battlefield 4. I don't really like FPS games but I hear it has stunning graphics and will be something to show the system off with. Can't believe there is no Little Big Planet, Gran Turismo, Final Fantasy, Uncharted, etc. Even one of these games would've been nice.

Those will come. I think PS4 is holding back on revealing big titles until closer to Black Friday or Christmas, just to totally piss on Microsoft's release numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Dead Rising is impressive? I guess if you enjoy the same repetitive mindless game over and over again sure. Dead Rising is about the last exclusive I actually would want if I wasn't getting an X1. I won't even bother renting it from Gamefly.

 

As for Killzone being a dull sequel....it's actually probably the most different of any of the Killzone games so that's pretty hard to understand. Am I bummed that Watchdogs, Infamous and Drive Club got pushed back? Absolutely. But to say the PS4 launch lineup is weaker than the WiiU's is incorrect. Did you even play Zombie U? It was complete garbage. New Super Mario Brothers U was the one saving grace in that entire launch lineup. Even the 2K14 the WiiU got was a watered down port where half the features didn't work as well as they did on the current gen. Between 2K14, Killzone, Resogun (which is free by the way), Battlefield 4 and Fifa 14 I would say the PS4 lineup is pretty good for a launch console. It's certainly better than the 360 or PS3's launch lineup. The X1 still has the best list (mainly because of Forza), but the PS4 isn't weak, a joke or any of the other things I've heard it called. Since when did we expect console launches to feature AAA games? They hardly ever do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

they're cutting microsoft out of the pc biz because of windows 8

 

but yeah, you can build your own steam machine, or go buy a dell and put the Steam OS on it and call it a steam machine

 

what it is, is an entirely open platform console

 

I don't get the their hate on Windows 8.  So people don't like the tile interface and that they have a store.  You can still install your own apps and games (I have on a windows 8 PC that I still can't get updated to 8.1 - another issue another time).

 

I would love to see how they handle the legacy of directX games from the past 20 years that people still love to play.  Will they use a WINE like solution (which isn't pretty) or get folks make it in OpenGL.  I'm on the same boat as you and Zod regarding OpenGL, I love it.  They just play better in OpenGL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersClinic Newbie

PanthersClinic

Posted
Posted

Dead Rising is impressive? I guess if you enjoy the same repetitive mindless game over and over again sure. Dead Rising is about the last exclusive I actually would want if I wasn't getting an X1. I won't even bother renting it from Gamefly.

 

As for Killzone being a dull sequel....it's actually probably the most different of any of the Killzone games so that's pretty hard to understand. Am I bummed that Watchdogs, Infamous and Drive Club got pushed back? Absolutely. But to say the PS4 launch lineup is weaker than the WiiU's is incorrect. Did you even play Zombie U? It was complete garbage. New Super Mario Brothers U was the one saving grace in that entire launch lineup. Even the 2K14 the WiiU got was a watered down port where half the features didn't work as well as they did on the current gen. Between 2K14, Killzone, Resogun (which is free by the way), Battlefield 4 and Fifa 14 I would say the PS4 lineup is pretty good for a launch console. It's certainly better than the 360 or PS3's launch lineup. The X1 still has the best list (mainly because of Forza), but the PS4 isn't weak, a joke or any of the other things I've heard it called. Since when did we expect console launches to feature AAA games? They hardly ever do.

 

Fair enough. I've never played a Dead Rising game and thought the trailer looked cool while I've played all the Killzone games and didn't see much interesting in the trailer. I am still waiting for my PS4. Resogun does look impressive after doing some research on it.

 

Launch is overrated though, that's why I got a PS4 even though I think the launch is relatively weak. Best launch I ever saw was the Sega Dreamcast. That console was the best example of not wanting to show your entire deck too early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
natty Newbie

natty

Posted
Posted

I always preferred OpenGL to directx anyways. Maybe developers will start switching back.

 

http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/01/Why-you-should-use-OpenGL-and-not-DirectX

 

 

other than the unreal engine, i don't really like the way directx feels and looks

 

I read a great article many years ago(mid 2000s) about how directx 'won' the battle with opengl.  In the 90s most games would implement both and you could choose, but over time microsoft was working faster to keep up with what ati and nvidia were doing with the hardware.  From what I remember, the opengl board were being very careful about how the api was devloped(not just doing what the card makers wanted, but questioning if it was the right way) while microsoft just coded away.  As a result directx had better support for the latest and greatest hardware features so game makers switched solely to directx.  This was around the time programmable shaders were coming out so support for those features was very important. 

 

I would love for opengl to make a comeback but it'll be hard.  As the article zod posted says, directx is engrained in the game developer community. 

 

 

edit:  this article says it a little better http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opengl-directx,2019.html

 

 

 

A turning point was reached with DirectX 8, released in 2001. For the first time, Microsoft’s API did more than just copy from SGI. It actually introduced innovations of its own like support for vertex and pixel shaders. SGI, whose main source of revenue was the sale of expensive 3D workstations, was in a bad position, having failed to foresee that the explosion of 3D cards for gamers would prompt ATI and Nvidia to move into the professional market with prices so low (due to economies of scale) that SGI couldn’t keep up. OpenGL’s development was also handicapped by bitter disputes among its proponents. Since the ARB—the group in charge of ratifying the API’s development—included many different, competing companies, it was hard to reach agreement on the features to be added to the API. Instead, each company promoted its own agenda. Conversely, Microsoft was working solely with ATI and Nvidia, using its weight to cast a deciding vote if there was disagreement.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      Edge Rushers

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • MHS831
      High look overview...

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Jackie Lee
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...