Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what 49er fans are saying


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Arizona isn't top 10 in yards or points. Only Seattle and you got stomped

And we were up on AZ after the first half despite dropping an open TD pass on a drive and a 4th down in the red zone on another ....we imploded late and the score snowballed at the end.

So the question was if you have played a comparable D.... Answer is only Seattle. AZ isn't

 

In YPG, Houston (#1), Seattle (#2), Titans (#11), Cards (#13), Green Bay (#15).

 

Meanwhile, the highest Ranked Ds the Panthers have beaten outside of Seattle are those same 13th ranked Cards and the 14th ranked Giants.

 

It works both ways. Outside of Seattle, the Panthers haven't faced a D like SFs. The Niners also weren't "stomped" as the score was 12-3 halfway through the 4th quarter...IN SEATTLE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You couldn't even score a TD against a team we killed.

 

Seattle's defense is better than yours.

 

You're right TB did better than us and everyone else that's played out there. So? They played Seattle better than you guys did too.

 

And who says we're a juggernaut? Some 21 year old keyboard jockey who never played football on a 49ers messageboard? If you've read any of teh rational 49ers fans posts, you'll know we're all nervous about this game. And rightly so.

 

 

The fact that we didn't score a TD against Zona was a outlier because of dropped passes in key situations (TD drop and 4th down drop), and an ill advised INT by Cam.

 

And don't act like you rolled Zona.  That whole game was determined by the 6 Zona turnovers.

 

Let me put that game in perspective for you.  San  Francisco scored 11 of their points off of a combined  -2 yards.

 

In other words, in order to score 11 of their points they only had to move the ball on offense a grand total of negative 2 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In YPG, Houston (#1), Seattle (#2), Titans (#11), Cards (#13), Green Bay (#15).

 

Meanwhile, the highest Ranked Ds the Panthers have beaten outside of Seattle are those same 13th ranked Cards and the 14th ranked Giants.

 

It works both ways. Outside of Seattle, the Panthers haven't faced a D like SFs. The Niners also weren't "stomped" as the score was 12-3 halfway through the 4th quarter...IN SEATTLE.

 

They didn't beat the Cardinals.

 

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2013100608/2013/REG5/panthers@cardinals#menu=highlights&tab=recap

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know how a few drops/muscues can kill you. And just like your game against ARI, our game against Seattle was the same way. The score wasn;t indicative of the game itself.

 

We have also improved immensely since then.

 

The reason that you got stomped by Seattle was because you only had one decent drive the whole game.  It was pitiful.

 

Mike Glennon looked like Joe Montana compared to Kaepernick against the Hawks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a Merry Christmas.

I'm not hanging my hat on anything but what we are.....the best D you will face this season.

Yeah, the Tampa Bay Sucks just played out there....they did a LOT better than your mighty 9ers.

You aren't this juggernaut some paint. And AZ has only 3 more turnovers than Seattle for the record

 

The only top 13 defense you guys have faced was Seattle and Arizona. They held you to 7 points and 6 points, respectively. Yes, they might have held us to 3, but we also played them in Seattle. 

 

We had 30+ on the Texans, Titans and Cardinals. Who are all top 13 NFL defenses

 

No offense, your defense is good, but it's not the best we have to face this season. Not even close, that title goes to Seattle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that we didn't score a TD against Zona was a outlier because of dropped passes in key situations (TD drop and 4th down drop), and an ill advised INT by Cam.

 

And don't act like you rolled Zona.  That whole game was determined by the 6 Zona turnovers.

 

Let me put that game in perspective for you.  San  Francisco scored 11 of their points off of a combined  -2 yards.

 

In other words, in order to score 11 of their points they only had to move the ball on offense a grand total of negative 2 yards.

 

Right...because the 49ers had nothing to do with any of the turnovers.

 

Even if you take away your magic 11 points, they won by 12. This game was also played without Aldon Smith and with a gimpy Patrick Wiilis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...our game against Seattle was the same way. The score wasn;t indicative of the game itself.

 

 

The Niners also weren't "stomped" as the score was 12-3 halfway through the 4th quarter...IN SEATTLE.

 

Just wanted to chime in and correct some incorrect "facts" laid out by a couple of the resident 49er fans here.

 

#1 - The score was very much indicative of the game. We turned you over 5 times in that game and held Gore to 16 yards.

 

#2 - You were stomped (see #1). And the score was actually 22-3 with 11:36 left in the 4th quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only top 13 defense you guys have faced was Seattle and Arizona. They held you to 7 points and 6 points, respectively. Yes, they might have held us to 3, but we also played them in Seattle. 

 

We had 30+ on the Texans, Titans and Cardinals. Who are all top 13 NFL defenses

 

No offense, your defense is good, but it's not the best we have to face this season. Not even close, that title goes to Seattle. 

 

Especially when they are IN Seattle.

 

Seattle and the Panthers tho are very different. The strength of Seattles D is really the secondary and the edge rush. Panthers are more like SF with a good front 7. Seattle more vulnerable to the run and Panthers more vulnerable to the pass.

 

Should be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right...because the 49ers had nothing to do with any of the turnovers.

 

Even if you take away your magic 11 points, they won by 12. This game was also played without Aldon Smith and with a gimpy Patrick Wiilis.

 

Well, then you may want to add the turnover in the third when Zona was in FG territory, so add those 3 points.......  you lost by 1.

 

You guys didn't kill Arizona, they killed themselves.

 

If we have 6 turnovers you may have a chance on Sunday again  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defensive scheme differs greatly from Seattle. You can't accurately compare their physical man coverage secondary to our cushion-giving hard hitter zone coverage secondary.

I haven't watched Seattle since they had a few of their DL return from injury, but when we played, their pass rush was dependent on their pass coverage. Our pass rush is dependent on brute power and speed from the DL.

Seattle let us dink and dunk all day, but it wasn't enough to pick up firsts.

Don't forget we also held Seattle to 12 points, half of which was scored on a CB who no longer starts for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to chime in and correct some incorrect "facts" laid out by a couple of the resident 49er fans here.

 

#1 - The score was very much indicative of the game. We turned you over 5 times in that game and held Gore to 16 yards.

 

#2 - You were stomped (see #1). And the score was actually 22-3 with 11:36 left in the 4th quarter.

 

BS.

 

Please.

 

For the lions share of that game BOTH defenses were dominating. It wasn't until the end that the 49ers defense back was broken mostly because Kaepernick started throwing the ball to blue jerseys.

 

Seattle deserved the win, no question, but it was not nearly the thumping that 'Hawk fans would like you to believe it was. Most 'Hawk fans with a clue concede that fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that we didn't score a TD against Zona was a outlier because of dropped passes in key situations (TD drop and 4th down drop), and an ill advised INT by Cam.

 

And don't act like you rolled Zona.  That whole game was determined by the 6 Zona turnovers.

 

Let me put that game in perspective for you.  San  Francisco scored 11 of their points off of a combined  -2 yards.

 

In other words, in order to score 11 of their points they only had to move the ball on offense a grand total of negative 2 yards.

 

Uh, what?

 

2 interceptions and 2 fumbles lost doesnt equal 6 turnovers.

 

 

And who gives a rats ***, should we not take credit for those turnovers? We also turned the ball over twice ourselves.

 

What's your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 49ers have faced only three QBs that you can even counts as decent.  Rodgers, Wilson, and Luck

 

They are 1-2 and given up 28 points per game.

 

Then they have shut down the likes of

 

Bradford

A Schaub/Yates combo

Palmer (actually didn't shut him down, they just had 6 turnovers and still scored 20 points)

Jake Locker (who threw for 321 yards)

Chad Henne

 

 

 

 

 

Yes the teams we beat also sucked, but at least we were shutting down the likes of Adrian Petersen, Eli Manning, and Matt Ryan whom are proven commodities in the NFL. 

 

And we pretty much shut down ole Russell also. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce put it in a spot only his guy could get it only for David Moore to drop it. T_T Tremble and Horn both struggled yesterday and that killed me since they're two of my favourite players. Tommy knows he has to come down with this one. Folks were understandably saying that JT would've caught that had he not gotten hurt a few plays earlier. The more I look at this play, the more I think that Bryce made the right decision throwing it out the back of the endzone. He could have tried to laser it in to Thielen, but that safety is lurking awfully close inside. Insuring the field goal here after a 44sec drive to end the half was the right move.
    • Except Bryce was the main reason we were in it 
    • NFL Pro has the All-22 up already 😄 Going to grab a play or two from each redzone series to put screenshots to. Looks like AT angled his route off to the near pylon rather than the back corner where Bryce was throwing to. I imagine this is something they'll quickly try to figure out with Thielen back from IR. After watching the All-22 again, this was actually a pretty nifty play. I thought it was a TE screen to Tremble because of the way XL charged the DB, but he quickly shed and kept upfield as seen in the second screenshot. This looks like it had multiple layers built into it with AT running the crosser, XL the fade, Tremble to the flat. The progression would call for the play to go to Chuba here as the LB does follow Tremble out into the flat. Ball hits Chuba low and in the hands, but the LB does a good job disrupting the catch.
×
×
  • Create New...