Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason Compensation: 7th round pick

UNCrules2187

By UNCrules2187,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Kurb Newbie

Kurb

Posted
Posted

What year was Rivers a pro bowler ??

Same year he was injured before the year he was injured with surgery and rehabbed for 24 months. Maybe the year he sucked ass for 3 games and his defense played better w/o him.

Beason had no value. He was/is one of my fav Panthers, but in his condition, age, and performance in recent history made him basically worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

We won't have two 7th round picks BTW, because we traded our original 7th for Colin Jones, an end of the roster STer who has 2 tackles on the season and wouldn't have made the final 53 man roster of the 49ers and was days away from being cut when we traded for him.

 

That would be Hurney. The same guy that signed Beason to a gigantic contract that ultimately is the reason he's no longer a Panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurb Newbie

Kurb

Posted
Posted

We won't have two 7th round picks BTW, because we traded our original 7th for Colin Jones, an end of the roster STer who has 2 tackles on the season and wouldn't have made the final 53 man roster of the 49ers and was days away from being cut when we traded for him.

He's actually made some plays

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

But we don't Have a losing record, do we? Nor is there any sign so far that we miss Beason on defense.

I gave a list of every team not in our division that runs a 4-3 and who their starter was when Beason asked for a trade. Show me who in that list had a bigger need than the Giants (or any need at all).

And I'll give you a hint: If you base any of your premise on h idea that maybe a 3-4 team would have wanted him, you've pretty much lot the debate (i.e. Clearly showing you don't know enough about football to know what you're talking about).

 

Ok if us winning makes this irrelevant, then Beast playing like a man that's showing some form of coming back makes that injury excuse irrelevant.

 

Am I right?

 

 

Jenkins was on IR twice before we traded him. Was overweight and had locker room issues. Went to Jets, had one good year and tore his ACL two more times again. They gave us a 2 picks for that. Im sure they were hoping for a lil more production than what they got, but they didn't let that stop them from doing the deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Ok if us winning makes this irrelevant, then Beast playing like a man that's showing some form of coming back makes that injury excuse irrelevant.

Am I right?

Jenkins was on IR twice before we traded him. Was overweight and had locker room issues. Went to Jets, had one good year and tore his ACL two more times again. They gave us a 2 picks for that. Im sure they were hoping for a lil more production than what they got, but they didn't let that stop them from doing the deal

No, you're not.

Beason is playing better now because he's back to playing middle linebacker. That wasn't going to happen here because Kuechly is just a better player. That is unless you're willing to argue that the team should have benched or moved Kuechly (hint: going that route will pretty much destroy your credibility).

Yes, the Jets gave up too much for Jenkins because 1) they had a need and 2) the team has a long history of being poorly run. You wanna show me where the like situation existed this year?

I've given you a list of teams and their MLB starters, and you've continually avoided it. Go back to the list and show me who beside the Giants had a need that was worth trading a pick to fill.

That, or just save yourself the embarrassment of making a bad choice and admit you have nothing to stand on outside of this ethereal notion that "somebody" would have made a better offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

No, you're not.

Beason is playing better now because he's back to playing middle linebacker. That wasn't going to happen here because Kuechly is just a better player. That is unless you're willing to argue that the team should have benched or moved Kuechly (hint: going that route will pretty much destroy your credibility).

Yes, the Jets gave up too much for Jenkins because 1) they had a need and 2) the team has a long history of being poorly run.

I've given you a list of teams and their MLB starters, and you've continually avoided it. Go back to the list and show me who beside the Giants had a need that was worth trading a higher pick to fill.

That, or just save yourself the embarrassment of making a bad choice and admit you have nothing to stand on outside of this ethereal notion that "somebody" would have made a better offer.

 

I didn't ignore it, it's irrelevant cause it already happened. I'm responding to you saying we couldn't got higher than a 7th, which like I said when the rumor had it was for a 5th. A 5th is higher than a 7th. Was you or anybody saying then, well we should have got a 7th for him. 6-7th rounders are for bums. 3-5th are for guys that has some playing history, but with injuries or problems. You know what a 1-2 rounder are for. You said it yourself we got him out of here, didn't negotiate and didn't wait. That's the issue. Did you respond to me saying we didn't negotiate for a receiver. Saying what teams would or would not do like you're a part of their front office is the same as me saying Gettle didn't attempt to trade for a receiver like I'm a part of the Panthers front office

 

By the way, we could have got a 4th from a team just to bring Beason in for a BACKUP MLB. That's definitely worth a 4th rounder as guys go down all the time. I'll wait for your counter to say no he's not worth a 4th to play a backup role, he wants to start and would have been a locker room problem and blah blah

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

I didn't ignore it, it's irrelevant cause it already happened. I'm responding to you saying we couldn't got higher than a 7th, which like I said when the rumor had it was for a 5th. A 5th is higher than a 7th. Was you or anybody saying then, well we should have got a 7th for him. 6-7th rounders are for bums. 3-5th are for guys that has some playing history, but with injuries or problems. You know what a 1-2 rounder are for. You said it yourself we got him out of here, didn't negotiate and didn't wait. That's the issue. Did you respond to me saying we didn't negotiate for a receiver. Saying what teams would or would not do like you're a part of their front office is the same as me saying Gettle didn't attempt to trade for a receiver like I'm a part of the Panthers front office

By the way, we could have got a 4th for a team just to bring Beason in for a BACKUP MLB. That's definitely worth a 4th rounder as guys go down all the time

Please stop!!!!!! Scott us yawning you.

You actually think we could have gotten a 4th from a team who wanted him as a backup?

Dear God boy...you be one clueless fool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...